Re: 4.1. Regressions

Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote (Mar 10): > Changing entry of Field Version from an older version to a newer one > should not happen. > When a user submits a new issue the Field Version should contain the > version on which the user observes the issue. Experienced community > members, primarily by QA

Re: 4.1. Regressions

how about the defects already have value in "QA Contact" Hi, Shows the possible regressions without someone in QA, only 5 found. Not many left ... Let's w

Re: 4.1. Regressions

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld < rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote: > Yuzhen Fan schrieb: > > Here is the analysis of possible cases >> > > Hi, > > plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. > > > I will send you bug list for your review

Re: 4.1. Regressions

On 3/19/14 9:58 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have > some MAC-Only issues in the list. > > CU > > Rainer > > > > Hyperlinks: > [1] >

Re: 4.1. Regressions

Hi, and we need help of an an experienced MAC user for [1], it seems we have some MAC-Only issues in the list. CU Rainer Hyperlinks: [1]

Re: 4.1. Regressions

Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is the analysis of possible cases Hi, plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. I will send you bug list for your review Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers m

Re: 4.1. Regressions

Here is the analysis of possible cases for bugs in query [1], together with the proposed instructions to review them, any comments and suggestions, please let me know. 1. New issue happens on new feature in 4.1, or migration issue only applies to 4.1(e.g. *Issue 124437*

Re: 4.1. Regressions

On 3/11/14 6:33 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > I think Bugzilla Help > tells it all. > There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for > very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), > from d

Re: 4.1. Regressions

Hi, I think Bugzilla Help tells it all. There only is no common sense whether key word should be used also for very old regressions (regression in OOo 1.0.1 compared to OOo 1.0.0), from developer's point of view only regressions in AOO 3.4-de

Re: 4.1. Regressions

course, have to be done, too!). I am used to do a query for regressions in trunk, what will allow to check whether there are known 4.1 regressions affecting my daily work. And fascinating, my query showed 1 Regression in 200 Bugs with Version 4.1 (I forgot what one it was). That sounds good, but it is

Re: 4.1. Regressions

ch more manifold and reliable test than testing with prepared testcases > (what, of course, have to be done, too!). > > I am used to do a query for regressions in trunk, what will allow to check > whether there are known 4.1 regressions affecting my daily work. And > fascinating, my query

4.1. Regressions

query for regressions in trunk, what will allow to check whether there are known 4.1 regressions affecting my daily work. And fascinating, my query showed 1 Regression in 200 Bugs with Version 4.1 (I forgot what one it was). That sounds good, but it is completely implausible that our 200 unfixed