Yep, that's the rev.
macOS builds being uploaded to the dev area as we speak...
Linux 64bit builds being, well, built ;)
> On Dec 11, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> All 415 buildbots finished successfully with Rev. 1817496.
>
> I think this is the revision for RC
Hi Jim,
All 415 buildbots finished successfully with Rev. 1817496.
I think this is the revision for RC1?
Regards, Matthias
Am 08.12.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Assuming no blockers, my plan is to start Linux and macOS RC1 builds
> on Monday or Tues. Matthias you still up for the Wi
Am 08.12.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Assuming no blockers, my plan is to start Linux and macOS RC1 builds
> on Monday or Tues. Matthias you still up for the Windows builds?
Yes, I am... ;-)
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mai
> On Dec 3, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
>
> We have a process which was working good in the past, so let's use it. Then
> it's also easier to tracker the real changes and document them in the Release
> Notes.
>
FTR: ++1
---
On 12/03/2017 01:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 03.12.2017 um 21:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
Are you accepting blockers? My only blocker would be the English
dictionary update https:
On 12/8/2017 9:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
>> rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
>>
>> As such, I encourage people to follow and
>> edit (as needed):
>>
>> https://cwiki.apach
Assuming no blockers, my plan is to start Linux and macOS RC1 builds
on Monday or Tues. Matthias you still up for the Windows builds?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Am 08.12.2017 um 15:43 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
As such, I encourage people to follow and
edit (as needed):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/disp
On 12/8/2017 6:43 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
As such, I encourage people to follow and
edit (as needed):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis
+1 from my side.
On 08.12.2017 15:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
As such, I encourage people to follow and
edit (as needed):
https://cwiki.apache.org/
> On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
> rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
>
> As such, I encourage people to follow and
> edit (as needed):
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.5
>
> wi
Am 05.12.2017 um 21:06 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 04/12/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
We don't have a 4.1.5 blocker flag in Bugzilla ...
How does one add one in Bugz?
Marcus knows the magic for it. I believe only Bugzilla admins can create
a ne
On 04/12/2017 toki wrote:
English dictionaries has an updated release every month, but extensions
for AOo [...] are only released every two months, unless there has
been a recent release, in which case the update extension release is
skipped.
This would be nice in theory. In practice, OpenOffic
On 04/12/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
We don't have a 4.1.5 blocker flag in Bugzilla ...
How does one add one in Bugz?
Marcus knows the magic for it. I believe only Bugzilla admins can create
a new flag.
Regards,
Andrea.
---
On 12/04/2017 12:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Are you accepting blockers?
>
> I am, yes :)
>> We don't have a 4.1.5 blocker flag in Bugzilla, but I guess we can do
>> without it if this is the only extra fix we will include - dictionary
>> updates are routine. Of course, if the dictionary upda
> On Dec 3, 2017, at 3:57 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
>> rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
>
> Are you accepting blockers?
I am, yes :)
> My only blocker would be the English dictionary update
> https://b
Am 03.12.2017 um 21:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
Are you accepting blockers? My only blocker would be the English
dictionary update https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=1276
Am 03.12.2017 um 21:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
> rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
>
> As such, I encourage people to follow and
> edit (as needed):
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.5
>
> with the goal
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
Are you accepting blockers? My only blocker would be the English
dictionary update https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127621 (a
new version is available and we don't want
I propose that we, "officially", start the ball
rolling in the process of releasing AOO 4.1.5.
As such, I encourage people to follow and
edit (as needed):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.5
with the goal of getting a 4.1.5-RC1 out "kinda soon" :)
-
20 matches
Mail list logo
