In brief:
Currently, a translation is released when it reaches 100%.
There were a few ideas when to include and exclude a translation in a
release (different for major, and minor). Some suggestions where to
continue to release even if there's no 100%, and there's an active
community of translator
Il 29/04/2014 09:47, jan i wrote:
On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
we had something like this before but defined a new rule to be 100% UI
complete and I think this is quite easy and a good rule.
Note: I'm keeping the 100% rule to add a language. I'm just saying that
we shouldn't
On 4/30/14 12:28 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/29/2014 07:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Marcus (OOo)
>> wrote:
>>> Am 04/29/2014 09:47 AM, schrieb jan i:
>>>
On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
>
Am 04/29/2014 07:57 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/29/2014 09:47 AM, schrieb jan i:
On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I propose that, once a langu
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 04/29/2014 09:47 AM, schrieb jan i:
>
>> On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I propose that, once a language reaches our rel
Am 04/29/2014 09:47 AM, schrieb jan i:
On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
(currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do no
Am 04/29/2014 08:19 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
(currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it
afterwards for the other minor releases.
With the current criteria, even if only a few new strings appear in
On 29 April 2014 09:36, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> >
> >> I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
> >> (currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it
> >> afterwards
On 4/29/14 9:20 AM, Tal Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
>> (currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it
>> afterwards for the other minor releases.
>>
>> [...] I would remove u
On Tue, Apr 29, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
> (currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it
> afterwards for the other minor releases.
>
> [...] I would remove unmaintained languages only when version 5.0 com
I propose that, once a language reaches our release quality criteria
(currently: UI translation at 100% and maintained), we do not drop it
afterwards for the other minor releases.
With the current criteria, even if only a few new strings appear in,
say, 4.2, this would mean that we have to dro
11 matches
Mail list logo
