Peter Kovacs wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20819 ...
The best way imho is to let the users vote. How about follwing flow:
1) check if we can include the extention by license or find an
agreement with the maintainers.
2) Put a call to Vote if the package should be included or no
On 12/01/2017 05:17 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>> This is absolutely a basic feature, i don't understand why there are
>>> more advanced regression types such as logaritmepic or poware when a
>>> polynomial regression is lacking.
> Maybe because we have an *Office* Suite and not a *Mathematical* Suite?
T
Am 02.12.2017 um 16:51 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Am Samstag, den 02.12.2017, 14:40 +0100 schrieb Marcus:
We said we would like to give our users a voice. Wouldn't it be
appropriate to give them exactly this voice? This is a clear
concept to
me.
maybe.
Sorry when this sounds too negative but tha
Am Samstag, den 02.12.2017, 14:40 +0100 schrieb Marcus:
>
> > We said we would like to give our users a voice. Wouldn't it be
> > appropriate to give them exactly this voice? This is a clear
> > concept to
> > me.
>
> maybe.
>
> Sorry when this sounds too negative but thats my opinion. I think a
Am 02.12.2017 um 11:22 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2017, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Marcus:
Am 01.12.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
For me the existance is not a strong argument. The bug is with 149
votes
quite popular. The discussion there is a repeatance that this is
basic
featu
Am Freitag, den 01.12.2017, 18:17 +0100 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 01.12.2017 um 18:09 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> > For me the existance is not a strong argument. The bug is with 149
> > votes
> > quite popular. The discussion there is a repeatance that this is
> > basic
> > feature.
>
> but we don't kno
in 2013:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201308.mbox/%3c5200fd92.3000...@gmail.com%3e
- Mail original -
De: "Mechtilde"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Décembre 2017 07:45:58
Objet: Re: Fwd: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
Hello Peter,
- Mail original -
De: "Mechtilde"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Décembre 2017 07:45:58
Objet: Re: Fwd: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
Hello Peter,
the extension is under which license?
After this information we can discuss how to work further
l original -
De: "Mechtilde"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Décembre 2017 07:45:58
Objet: Re: Fwd: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
Hello Peter,
the extension is under which license?
After this information we can discuss how to work further on it
Kind regard
201308.mbox/%3c5200fd92.3000...@gmail.com%3e
>
>
>- Mail original -
>De: "Mechtilde"
>À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Décembre 2017 07:45:58
>Objet: Re: Fwd: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
>
>Hello Peter,
>
>th
---
> Von: bugzi...@apache.org
> Gesendet: 30. November 2017 23:15:53 MEZ
> An: iss...@openoffice.apache.org
> Betreff: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20819
>
> --- Comment #78 from Robert Pollak ---
> Let me me
gzi...@apache.org
> Gesendet: 30. November 2017 23:15:53 MEZ
> An: iss...@openoffice.apache.org
> Betreff: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20819
>
> --- Comment #78 from Robert Pollak ---
> Let me mention that
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: bugzi...@apache.org
Gesendet: 30. November 2017 23:15:53 MEZ
An: iss...@openoffice.apache.org
Betreff: [Issue 20819] add polynomial regression type
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20819
--- Comment #78 from Robert Pollak ---
Let me
13 matches
Mail list logo
