Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Carl Marcum
On 6/9/22 11:46 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in AOO41X. These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X. What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or not due to not wanting to change API's o

Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi Damjan, On 6/9/22 1:20 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time bac

Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Marcus wrote: Am 09.06.22 um 19:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? +1 from me. The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't

Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Marcus
Am 09.06.22 um 19:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: For discussion: Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? +1 from me. The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste ti

Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum wrote: > For discussion: > Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x? > The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected 4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x which was about to be EOL. Regards

Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Carl, all, Am 09.06.22 um 17:46 schrieb Carl Marcum: > Hi All, > > I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in > AOO41X. > These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X. > > What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or > not due to no

[DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi All, I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in AOO41X. These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X. What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or not due to not wanting to change API's or whatever. To me these seem more like bug