To expand and clarify on Mark's excellent points:
Mark Thomas wrote earlier:
> On 2016-09-06 17:06 (+0100), Simos Xenitellis
> wrote:
>
> Just responding to these specific bits with my Apache Brand
> Management Committee member hat on.
>
>> which claims that the Apache Foundation has the Apach
On 11/10/14 6:27 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 10/11/2014 Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> On 24.10.2014 21:49, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> Just received an e-mail pointing to the ApacheCon EU template at
>> http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/apachecon-europe/program/speaker-guide
>> which is a
>> brea
There have been a number of threads recently that seem to have been more
controversial than needed - or is healthy - for such a widespread
community like AOO.
While there have been a number of different suggestions about behaviors
and details of voting rules, I think a far simpler suggestion t
Continuing to provide the 3.x and earlier versions of OpenOffice.org
software - which we still brand that on some documentation pages and on
those download pages - shows our continued use of the mark.
I'd prefer to discuss specific legal questions about exactly where we
should use the (R) symb