I can't believe I forgot probably the most important point here.
We will be using everything we've got in /trunk unless there's some HUGE
compelling issue not to.
--
Kay Schenk
Apache OpenOffice
"Things work out best for those who make
the best of the wa
FYI: communication with pono from infra
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Questions about buildbot internals
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:31:45 -0700
From: Kay sch...@apache.org
Reply-To: ksch...@apache.org
To: Pono Takamori
CC: infrastruct...@apache.org
Hello all--
I think it would be valuable to discuss some general issues/ideas with
the upcoming 4.2 release. My plan is to keep this general discussion "in
play" until Sat, Sept 3, then do a summary with what was agreed to.
WARNING: This is quite long!
*PRIORITIES*
1. Update the localization.
W
On 08/19/2016 08:20 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> Hi all--
>>
>> I am volunteering to be release manager for 4.2.0. I have been involved
>> in all the AOO releases since 3.40, and I'm familiar with the process.
>> Like all of us involved with the project, I am a volunteer. Due to this,
On 08/19/2016 10:37 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 09:09
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Ready to setup release build machines?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/12/2016 12:22 PM
On 08/21/2016 10:46 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 19/08/2016 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> I thought that the basic requirement is that the release manager(s) do
>> any builds on a machine under their [exclusive] individual control.
>
> This way one would need to rely on individual volunteers t
On 08/18/2016 02:00 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>
> On 08/17/2016 04:37 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 12 Aug, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>>> Sadly it's not that simple: Junit builds with Maven, and Hamcrest with
>>> Gradle.
>>>
>>> Is it ok to download the binaries, or is only source code allowed under
>>
On 01/28/2016 04:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> As I wrote a few day ago, in theory it would be good to release
> OpenOffice 4.2.0 in February. If it happens a bit later it wouldn't be a
> big issue, but I believe that, in the constant balance between periods
> where we are focused on talks (inte
On 08/13/2016 02:16 PM, Marcus wrote:
> As we have now the patched library file and Readme for all platforms,
> IMHO not much more is needed to go public with the hotfix. Therefore
> I've created a draft version of the hotfix download webpage:
>
> http://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice
On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
>
>
> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> [top posting]
>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on
On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> [top posting]
> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32,
> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructions on the actual
> HOTFIX page, we need to have just a "general" instruction for ALL zips
> that simply says -- "Un
On 08/11/2016 01:42 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> If you've been checking the buildbots you'll see that all who don't use
> --without-junit are currently broken in ./configure due to junit being too
> old. This is unlikely to change, as the buildslaves are running Ubuntu
> 10.04 which does
On 08/09/2016 10:34 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Don Lewis wrote:
If you get through the build, that's a pretty good test. During the
build saxparser uses expat to read the .xml files for all of the
locales.
The other thing that expat seems to get used for is the tree view of
On 08/09/2016 09:21 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now that the buildbots work, and we are planning to start with releases
> again, it would be nice to have a good set of tests to run against
> releases, and running them against nightly builds wouldn't hurt either.
>
> Our unit tests do r
On 08/08/2016 09:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> On 8/8/2016 11:14 AM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 08/08/2016 07:28 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> On 07/08/2016 Marcus wrote:
Maybe we are not that far aways from each other. What I want to to
avoid
is to provide hundreads of MBs for a s
On 07/30/2016 09:51 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> The problem is definitely in r1409590, in the LinkTarget.mk patch.
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>> I've narrowed this Windows build performance regression down to the
>> original branches/gbuild commits 1409589
OK, I think I'm done with the LInux64 bit area as well.
And see below
On 07/31/2016 01:10 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 07/31/2016 08:52 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> Well...I didn't see this message before I got started and I just
>> finished with Linux32 and used Ariel's patch for this. Of course i
On 07/31/2016 05:55 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> On 07/31/2016 08:25 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 30/07/2016 Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> duplicate fixed
>>> libraries for Linux-32, and Linux-64 based on submissions from Carl,
>>> Damjan, and Ariel. I'd be happy to move these somewhere in the next
>>> da
+1 this looks like a good plan
On 07/24/2016 02:37 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> While the severity of the security bug we disclosed
> http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2016-1513.html is not
> particularly high (it is classified as "Medium" with no known exploits
> and anti-virus software
19 matches
Mail list logo
