Internal error (actually my bad I made a bad change to the svn authz file).
Please make a minor edit and try again, it should work now.
On Monday, May 19, 2014 6:53 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>
>
>Am 05/20/2014 12:19 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>> I was working on getting Tal's suggestions up in the
underlying
svn commands. What you are working with in the webgui is an svn
checkout of the site. "Update" just brings your current checkout up
to date within the portion of the tree that you are browsing.
HTH
On Monday, May 19, 2014 3:44 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>
>
>A
Sorry but technically the CMS publishes all committed
changes to the staging site. The only way to partition
changes is to partition your commits.
> On Monday, May 19, 2014 3:17 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> > Am 05/19/2014 09:51 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> On 29/04/2014 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am I missing something here? Images have been restored,
the service is on more stable gear now, and if uploads do
not currently work (as of today) please file a ticket.
On Sunday, April 27, 2014 12:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 25/04/2014 Rob Weir wrote:
>> But we still have the problem of l
I do have filesystem access but need some hints on where I should
look for things. Any ideas about filenames etc?
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 4:53 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:45 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 24 April 2014 18:21, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>>> We had to res
In a nutshell the message you are trying to approve
has only a single HTML mime component and your
list is configured to strip that component, leaving
an empty message which ezmlm refuses to deliver.
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 2:42 PM, Guy Waterval
wrote:
Hi all,
>
>I received this one two da
We had to restore blogs from backups, so some of the latest
data was lost. The service is stable again, sorry for the inconvenience
this has caused.
Buildbot/CMS is still not building off commit-triggers with no predictable ETA,
but we're hoping the resolution will come in days versus weeks.
O
CMS is not working at this point, sorry. Please be patient
while we debug.
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 11:04 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
wrote:
On 4/22/14 4:56 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>> CMS appears to be back up.
>>
>> Blog is down.
>>
>> Just got a report that downloads were timing out. Appears to be
Ah NO. Those so-called "phantom" committers
had their commit to this projext revoked when you graduated
to a TLP, but the larger point that Greg's making
remains true- it is a false sense of security to
rely on ACL's to pretend you don't need to vet your
commit list. See http://www.apache.org/dev
FWLIW, passive users of Apache projects generally expect
and get very little direct say in what features
get actively developed and put back into the project.
OTOH, people who actively contribute, by either supplying
patches, or filing quality and timely bug reports with
enough details for some de
The PMC decides whether or not an expressed
veto is "valid" or not. But generally speaking,
vetos should not be either thrown around willy-
nilly nor should they be challenged every time
they are issued.
It's all part of how we work, this recent episode
should be considered a learning experience
3 days I'd say is fine. There is no
need to rush out and "fix" a broken trunk,
no matter what the rationale may be.
>
> From: Pedro Giffuni
>To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
>Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:32 PM
>Subject: Re: Proposal: How we should hand
Yes editing svn:log revprops
is admissible and done routinely.
>
> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:24 AM
>Subject: Re: missing commit log
>
>Hi Carl,
>
>On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:38:44PM -0500,
7;t have to weigh in to your deliberations
about what the right value is for POWER(0,0)
unless you insist in supporting the evaluation
of polynomialexpressions using the POWER
function.
>________
> From: Joe Schaefer
>To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
, February 13, 2013 12:30 PM
>Subject: Re: Calc behavior: result of 0 ^ 0
>
>On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>> OTOH I haven't seen anyone issue a technical
>> veto on this change, which is really what's
>> required before Pedro actually
OTOH I haven't seen anyone issue a technical
veto on this change, which is really what's
required before Pedro actually needs to revert
anything.
>____
> From: Joe Schaefer
>To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org" ; Pedro Giffuni
>
>Se
Honestly I'd say that if anything is clear,
it's that changing away from the status quo
currently enjoys zero consensus.
As a Ph.D. mathematician who knows about Bourbaki,
all I can say is that line of argument is curious
here. There are no authorities other than the spec
to turn to about how you
This tempest in a teapot is not about
a wayward revert as you did not completely
back out the commit- you just patched it.
BFD- move on.
>
> From: Rob Weir
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni
>Sent: Saturday, February 2, 2013 1:40 PM
>Subject: Re: R
Hm, looks like it didn't recover
properly from a reboot action.
Should be up now.
>
> From: Ariel Constenla-Haile
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 7:07 AM
>Subject: Bugzilla down
>
>Hi,
>
>FYI bugzilla has been down for several
ntent, html => %args;
}
>________
> From: Joe Schaefer
>To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
>Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:25 AM
>Subject: Re: Help needed on CMS : How can we bypass template application?
>
>1 or 2 is the easiest to accomplish:
>just alter the regexps in pat
1 or 2 is the easiest to accomplish:
just alter the regexps in path.pm to ignore
those directories (you'll need a negative pattern
so be sure to test it before applying).
>
> From: Rob Weir
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 11:23
_
> From: Rob Weir
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 6:48 PM
>Subject: Re: Project website migrated
>
>On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> For those not following
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5603 :
CMS stuff won't work til I upgrade the
paths- sorry, that won't be til tomorrow.
>
> From: Kay Schenk
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 6:29 PM
>Subject: Re: Our SVN moved from "incubator/ooo" to "openoffice"
>
>
>
>On 11/26/2012
With the holiday weekend coming up, I'd like
to suggest that that's as good a time as any
to adjust the location of your svn tree to
top-level. Instead of doing a straight svn mv
of the tree, I plan to copy it instead and
set the old location read-only, given that
past source releases still depen
Your change to the authz file goes into effect
immediately- it's just that the scripts that
service the "committer-index" URLs are cronned
to run only a few times a day.
>
> From: Andrea Pescetti
>To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012
Come to Apachecon NA in Portland Rob and I'll
buy you a beer for all the good work I've seen
you do!
>
> From: Rob Weir
>To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
>Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 2:19 PM
>Subject: Re: ApacheCon EU Survey
>
>On Nov 10, 2012, at 11:31
26 matches
Mail list logo
