> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 9:42 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment
> object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]
> > The question of what "compatib
Hi Peter and All,
On 10/24/21 2:47 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi,
On 24.10.21 20:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: QA automatisation in AOO
Hello a
Hi!
On 24.10.21 21:27, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
Hi,
I am developing an infra for QA. Initially aimed for accessibility, I
think the whole community can use this: they are based on Dogtail and
track events from at-spi, on Linux, that enables to see if a key press
or a mouse mouvement has
On 24.10.21 20:57, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:19 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment
object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]
Hi J
Hi,
I am developing an infra for QA. Initially aimed for accessibility, I
think the whole community can use this: they are based on Dogtail and
track events from at-spi, on Linux, that enables to see if a key press
or a mouse mouvement has the appropriate feedback from an event point of
view.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:19 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment
> object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]
>
> Hi Jörg,
>
> Check:
>
>
>
Hi,
On 24.10.21 20:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: QA automatisation in AOO
Hello all,
In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask abou
Hello,
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2021 2:32 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: QA automatisation in AOO
>
> Hello all,
>
> In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask about how
> we could
> improv
On 24.10.21 16:13, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear dev@,
Hi!
this may have been raised many other times... but why do we keep
publishing release notes under the "Project Planning" cwiki page [1]
when that page starts with a big warning that is only for the
incubation phase? :-)
I think there are a
Dear dev@,
this may have been raised many other times... but why do we keep
publishing release notes under the "Project Planning" cwiki page [1]
when that page starts with a big warning that is only for the
incubation phase? :-)
My humble suggestion, given the fact that the section contains updat
Dear Dave, All,
thank you for all the replies to this thread.
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:58:32PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
> We have these pages:
> https://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_aoo40.html
[...]
I understand there are plenty of "minimum system requirements"
scattered aroun
Hello all,
In the discussion on API, and releases Jörg has ask about how we could
improve QA.
The only way in general is to formalize. We need to define testcases and
automate those.
There are 2 ways of Automation:
1) is through Code
2) is through GUI.
Today both can be automated.
@1)
Hi Jörg,
Check:
Version Number Assignment (Apache OpenOffice internal)
Structure
..
Explanation
: huge release with visible changes and new features including
incompatible API changes if necessary. Translation updates are most
often necessary to address the UI visible chang
13 matches
Mail list logo
