RE: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

2021-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 11:18 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment > object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API] > The API Documentati

Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

2021-10-17 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Hello All, replying to myself as a correction. On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 07:08:25PM +0200, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: [...] > Those pages should be generated by Autodoc, for what I understand. > > Are there any scripts that do this? Or any policies on how and when to > update the API documentation?

Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

2021-10-17 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hi Jörg, On 17.10.21 19:48, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello Peter, -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 11:27 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Im

Re: Happy Anniversary (9 years as TLP)

2021-10-17 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 06:41:31PM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 17/10/2021 Matthias Seidel wrote: > > On this day, 9 years ago Apache OpenOffice became an Apache Top Level > > Project (TLP). > > Thanks for the reminder... and a big thank you to those who still ensure the > continued success

RE: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

2021-10-17 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello Peter, > -Original Message- > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 11:27 AM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment > object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API] > > Hi Jörg, > > >

Re: Happy Anniversary (9 years as TLP)

2021-10-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 17/10/2021 Matthias Seidel wrote: On this day, 9 years ago Apache OpenOffice became an Apache Top Level Project (TLP). Thanks for the reminder... and a big thank you to those who still ensure the continued success of OpenOffice! Regards, Andrea.

Re: Happy Anniversary (9 years as TLP)

2021-10-17 Thread Jürgen Lange
I thank them all, too. Regards, Jürgen Am 17.10.2021 um 12:04 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all, On this day, 9 years ago Apache OpenOffice became an Apache Top Level Project (TLP). Thanks to all the volunteers who made that happen and spent their private time since then! Regards,    Matthi

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

2021-10-17 Thread GitBox
leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085618 Sure. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

2021-10-17 Thread GitBox
Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085404 With the code now in trunk, do we want to start testing it? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee edited a comment on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

2021-10-17 Thread GitBox
leginee edited a comment on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085021 Sorry, I forgot about it. I wanted to run the code once. I note in my review the state I have. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To resp

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #122: Address bug 128356 and similar ones (duplicated XML attributes)

2021-10-17 Thread GitBox
leginee commented on pull request #122: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122#issuecomment-945085021 Sorry, I forgot about it. I wanted to run the code once. The code change itself looked fine, from code review perspective. -- This is an automated message from the

Happy Anniversary (9 years as TLP)

2021-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi all, On this day, 9 years ago Apache OpenOffice became an Apache Top Level Project (TLP). Thanks to all the volunteers who made that happen and spent their private time since then! Regards,    Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: ZLIB

2021-10-17 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Peter, Am 17.10.21 um 11:33 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Hi Matrthias, > > Can you post the Error from the buiild? I will try... Basically it is MSVC 2008 (EOL since 2018) complaining about deprecated code in ZLIB. Of course It builds, somehow... ;-) Regards,    Matthias > > Thanks > > All the

Re: ZLIB

2021-10-17 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hi Matrthias, Can you post the Error from the buiild? Thanks All the best Peter On 03.10.21 22:00, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi all, bumping this one up because I just got an error while building on Windows complaining about zlib. I don't know if that is a real problem now (I just started the

Re: API doc on web site [Was: Accessing the comment object (annotation) in Draw/Impress via API]

2021-10-17 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hi Jörg, I am not sure what you refer to. The documentation has no influence on backward compatibility. According to current rules for Version numbers we must bump the first digit if we do an API change. So for Version 5 we must provide a Documentation a Version 4 Documentation and a Vers