Hi Andrea
> On 05/29/2021 9:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Several other, more modern, icon
> projects are available, like
> https://remixicon.com/
> (Apache License AL2, latest update July 2020). They are monochrome, so
> they might work better in dark mode.
This one is really interesting! C
Pedro Lino wrote:
On 05/28/2021 10:27 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
In short, a possible explanation should be: we were carrying GPL icons
and deleted them due to license incompatibility, but in the meantime,
and independently, those icons had been relicensed to avoid excessive
restrictions; so they
> On May 28, 2021, at 3:01 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> On 5/28/21 4:46 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> On 28.05.21 22:04, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> replying to an older message in this thread.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote
> On May 28, 2021, at 1:04 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> replying to an older message in this thread.
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 07:23:16PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
>
> [...]
>> Hopefully we can collect the exceptions in the BZ issue noted in this thread
>> and then agree
Hi all
> On 05/28/2021 10:27 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Now, it could be that icons were relicensed after they became part of
> OpenOffice. While Wikipedia is definitely not a trusted source, it talks
> about a public domain relicensing in 2009 due to the original terms
> being too restricti
