Hi,
When clicking the download link, a new tab appears with this URL:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.7/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.7_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe/download
Then it says "This site cannot be reached"
I'm using google chrome browser on windows
dev-hyeondnl commented on pull request #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/90#issuecomment-660584716
OK I think there is a mistake in GetTitle function:( It seems that adding a
space before this line works.
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/blob/trunk/main/sfx2/source
cbmarcum commented on pull request #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/90#issuecomment-660562354
Will the bugzilla issue remain open for the Item 3 in the attachment about
Untitled1 vs Untitled 1 with a space difference between titlebar and menus?
-
cbmarcum removed a comment on pull request #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/90#issuecomment-660561183
Writer context menu now shows a space before the parenthesis and displays
inactive also. This looks consistent with Calc now.
I can also confirm that the help window
cbmarcum commented on pull request #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/90#issuecomment-660561183
Writer context menu now shows a space before the parenthesis and displays
inactive also. This looks consistent with Calc now.
I can also confirm that the help window is filte
Hi Carl,
Am 18.07.20 um 19:07 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> I've started a Linux build of this PR and trunk.
Great!
So far this seems to work as intended, but I found a little problem
(related) in
/main/sw/source/ui/utlui/navipi.cxx
That will be another issue...
Regards,
Matthias
>
> Thanks,
>
I've started a Linux build of this PR and trunk.
Thanks,
Carl
On 7/14/20 6:01 AM, GitBox wrote:
Pilot-Pirx opened a new pull request #90:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/90
See: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128395
I took over the logic from https://git
Hi all,
It seems that the server is already reachable under:
http://opengrok.openoffice.org
I just updated our website accordingly.
Regards,
Matthias
Am 18.07.20 um 12:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> ok. Will check.
>
> Am 18.07.20 um 11:40 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> Can you please also see i
Am 18.07.20 um 12:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> ok. Will check.
That would be an option called "tabSize" I think...
https://github.com/oracle/opengrok/issues/3136
Re-Index is needed after the change.
Matthias
>
> Am 18.07.20 um 11:40 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> Can you please also see if we can
ok. Will check.
Am 18.07.20 um 11:40 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Can you please also see if we can set tab size to 4 spaces?
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:08 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
I have admin access. I will look into it asap.
Am 16.07.20 um 11:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
Our OpenGro
Can you please also see if we can set tab size to 4 spaces?
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:08 AM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I have admin access. I will look into it asap.
>
>
> Am 16.07.20 um 11:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Our OpenGrok server needs some attention:
> > http://openoffic
I think in the end it needs to run on a mac OSx Lion, because we claim
it will.
So if recent targets build a Version that installs and works with MacOSx
Lion, we could simplify our build setup for Macs.
All the Best
Peter
Am 18.07.20 um 10:34 schrieb Hyeon Lee:
Thanks for the replies!
I
Thanks for the replies!
I tried with higher version sdks for the configuration, and it seems that there
are no serious problems to finish it.
I was just wondering if there are some old sdks dependencies that does not
support the latest OS that i didn’t notice.
But I will test my codes on 10.
I have admin access. I will look into it asap.
Am 16.07.20 um 11:42 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi all,
Our OpenGrok server needs some attention:
http://openoffice-vm1-he-de.apache.org/
The index was last updated on Wednesday June 10.
I would also like to have it available under something like:
Hello Hyeon,
I am not sure. I think we moved up to 10.11 because it still supports
the target 10.07 and is still supported by current Code.
We tend to support rather a huge range of history, this decision is
contrary to usual Production line.
We currently still target:
Windows XP (4.1.7 s
15 matches
Mail list logo
