I've run into quite a few issues in C++11 mode. On FreeBSD, I'm forcing
gnu++98 mode with modern compilers. That matches the long time gcc
default.
On 27 Oct, arie...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> arielch pushed a commit to branch tr
On 27 Oct, arie...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> arielch pushed a commit to branch trunk
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice.git
>
> commit 958717d596e223826fa78462155b4447d227e5d3
> Author: Ariel Constenla-H
Hi -
There is an offer from Microsoft for Apache committers to get a free MSDN
license. If that gives access to the proper signing keys then that would be the
way to go.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 3:22 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> I do not want to spend money on
I do not want to spend money on this service, without having tried with infra
or Microsoft directly.
I am sure the ASF has something. And if not I am sure Microsoft gives us access
at better conditions then the 3rd party offer.
Am 28. Oktober 2019 20:59:15 MEZ schrieb Pedro Lino :
>Hi Peter
>
>
Hi Peter
> For Windows it would help in a first step if someone can search the
> resources on MSN and post links of the validation process described by MS.
>
This is what is needed for Windows Certification: a Code Signing Certificate
https://www.ksoftware.net/code-signing-certificates
Gi
Am 28.10.19 um 17:20 schrieb Doyle Phillips:
Secure Connection Failed
An error occurred during a connection to downloads.sourceforge.net.
PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR
The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the
authenticity of the received data could not be verified.
I've downl
Am 28.10.19 um 16:26 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Just a reminder that in addition to trunk and AOO418, we also have the AOO42X
branch... If you add stuff to trunk, please be sure to see if it is also
applicable to 4.2.0-dev, especially if you also back port it to the 4.1.8
branch. Currently, trunk
Thanks, but what I need is a magic wand of cable untangling I don't
suppose you have one handy.
In installing my new computer I found that the cables connecting various
computers, displays, router, and printer are a mess.
On 10/28/2019 9:51 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Patricia,
How are th
Jim,
Can you try notarization with xcode 10 or do we still need code changes?
Am 28. Oktober 2019 17:33:26 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino
>wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim, all
>>
>>
>>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski
>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Guys calm down. The notarization is no easy thing to do. It is complex process,
involving updates of dependencies and involves code changes.
I am trying to push the topic since 2016 for mac when I have joined. Now we are
almost at it to solve this. It has been a team effort from the start where
Yes please try. If you have issues we can check on solutions. :)
Am 28. Oktober 2019 18:09:52 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that
>works :)
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb
Am 28.10.19 um 18:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :)
Yes, give it a try. ;-)
I am curious if you get instant feedback or if we have to wait for a
response. That would be a time factor to consider for our releases...
>
>> On
I will use Xcode11 to notarize it... It's worth a shot to see if that works :)
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 1:07 PM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro
>> (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/not
Secure Connection Failed
An error occurred during a connection to downloads.sourceforge.net.
PR_CONNECT_RESET_ERROR
The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the
authenticity of the received data could not be verified.
Please contact the website owners to inform them of
Am 28.10.19 um 18:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro
> (https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
>
> I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
That's interesting, but
It appears that one can notarize an App after bistro
(https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode/notarizing_your_app_before_distribution/customizing_the_notarization_workflow)...
I will try w/ the current 4.1.7 dmgs
-
To uns
Hi Patricia,
How are things going?
If you are in need of something just let me know...
Regards,
Matthias
Am 26.10.19 um 06:24 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> Any opinions on which I should do?
>
>
> On 10/25/2019 1:27 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hi Patricia,
>>
>> If you want to build 4.1.x h
Hi Pedro,
Am 28.10.19 um 17:40 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> > >
>>> > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-)
>> > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a
>> 4.1.8 release.
>>> > Welcome to the team!
> I don't understand
>
> > >
> >
> > > Do you volunteer? Remember, we all are only volunteers... ;-)
>
> > > I believe these two issues should be enough reason for a
> 4.1.8 release.
> >
> > > Welcome to the team!
>
I don't understand the cynicism.
I believe I have contr
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:16 PM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>
> Hi Jim, all
>
>
>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>
>>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
>>> notarization
Hi Pedro,
Am 28.10.19 um 17:16 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi Jim, all
>
>
>> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>>
>>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
>>> notarization, apps won't
Hi Jim, all
> On October 28, 2019 at 3:34 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >
> > Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
> > notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
>
> Not quite true. You can still ru
Am 28.10.19 um 16:34 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>
>> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
>> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
> Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is
> On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:29 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
> notarization, apps won't work on Catalina.
Not quite true. You can still run non-notarized apps on Catalina... it is just
harder than before to "bypass" GateKeeper.
On 28.10.2019 07:40, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi Helen,
>
> AFAIK the current version 4.1.7 should work, as all other versions did work
> before.
> Can you describe your issue in more detail?
Even I saw reports on this very list to the tune that, without proper
notarization, apps won't work on Cat
Just a reminder that in addition to trunk and AOO418, we also have the AOO42X
branch... If you add stuff to trunk, please be sure to see if it is also
applicable to 4.2.0-dev, especially if you also back port it to the 4.1.8
branch. Currently, trunk and AOO42X are functionally in-sync (only delt
26 matches
Mail list logo
