4.2.0 the idea is we could reference it to Douglas Adams answer 42.
Which is kinda funny.
However I would like to postpone the discussion towards 20ties since I have
.ore time then. Very unselfish of me I know. ;)
All the best
Peter
Am 10. Oktober 2017 01:00:36 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>I
Hi -
It is worth letting the idea “percolate” while 4.1.4 release proceeds to
completion.
I like Jm’s thought. Announcing plans while announcing a release and then
executing on it would be the the best AOO marketing possible. We proceed with
whoever helps methodically.
My 2cts.
Regards,
Dave
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 7:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
>> way straight to 4.5.0...
>> Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
>> bigger step in number might be justified. Especially
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
way straight to 4.5.0...
Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
bigger step in number might be justified. Especially if
we drop some older supported platforms.
We should focus on 4.1.4
I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the
way straight to 4.5.0...
Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a
bigger step in number might be justified. Especially if
we drop some older supported platforms.
Hmmm. For some reason, either the build system isn't specifying
-L./solver/420/unxmaccx.pro/lib or else it's wanting to
link when it doesn't need to.
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build AOO 4.2.0 on macOS 10.12.6 and
> I'm getting this error:
>
> ld: lib
I'm trying to build AOO 4.2.0 on macOS 10.12.6 and
I'm getting this error:
ld: library not found for -ltl
R=/Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo && S=$R/main &&
O=$S/solver/420/unxmaccx.pro && W=$O/workdir && mkdir -p
$W/SrsPartMergeTarget/vcl/source/src/ && DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$O/lib
$O/bin/t
