> On May 25, 2017, at 3:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
>> release manager :)
>
> OK, perfect!
>
>> As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
>> latest.
>
> I don't think nex
From the Source Code Point of view. You are right.
Our License does not prohibit selling. The issue I see is in the
unsanctioned use of OpenOffice.
The Product name has been for example altered.
However this is up to the Apache Members on the List to check if these
are sanctioned by Apache o
That was the link I was looking for! ;-)
Will try the ones from 4.1.2 in my next build.
Regards, Matthias
Am 25.05.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> On 24/05/2017 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> As I said before, these are most likely not the official build options,
>> but they work (for me).
Hi,
I'm by no means an expert on opensource licenses, so i just want to clarify
something
As I understand it, there is nothing wrong for someone to sell or repackage
open sourced software, most open source licenses explicitly allow that.
Provided of course that certain conditions are met(like one
Hi my name is James, I was shopping online for new software as I don't at
the moment have the $100's of dollars to purchase a new copy of microsoft
office suite and I came accross a couple of sellers on ebay selling your
product or product keys. I wanted to research OpenIffice as I have never
heard
On 24/05/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've been operating under the assumption that I *am* the
release manager :)
OK, perfect!
As such, I think we should shoot for a release next week at the
latest.
I don't think next week is realistic, since the process takes longer.
Still, if the idea is to
