Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Marcus wrote: > Or choose the item "Older releases" if you need a way older version. Then > you can get it - by clicking on the Archive link - from our archive. > Except you just deleted the page that the dropdown points to for v3.4.1 - it just gave me a 404 er

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Marcus
Am 10.05.2017 um 23:37 schrieb Simon Phipps: On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Marcus wrote: However, it doesn't matter. There is no reason to provide download pages to offer outdated versions - based on w.oo.o. Of course we cannot influence what others are offering on their webpages. I disa

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Wed, 10 May 2017 at 23:37, Simon Phipps wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Marcus wrote: > > > > > However, it doesn't matter. There is no reason to provide download pages > > to offer outdated versions - based on w.oo.o. Of course we cannot > influence > > what others are offering on

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 10.05.2017 um 23:21 schrieb Marcus: > Am 10.05.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Hagar Delest: >> A user raised this strange result: when performing a Google search with >> "openoffice download", the 3.4.1 version is the 3rd choice, this tends >> to present the 3.4.1 version as a not that old one. Is there

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Simon Phipps
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 10:21 PM, Marcus wrote: > > However, it doesn't matter. There is no reason to provide download pages > to offer outdated versions - based on w.oo.o. Of course we cannot influence > what others are offering on their webpages. > I disagree. I and users I support have often

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Marcus
Am 10.05.2017 um 21:07 schrieb Hagar Delest: A user raised this strange result: when performing a Google search with "openoffice download", the 3.4.1 version is the 3rd choice, this tends to present the 3.4.1 version as a not that old one. Is there a way to change that from the AOO site? See: htt

Re: Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Matthias Seidel
Well, I have a totally different result with google.de, nevertheless I am in the process to exclude old content on openoffice.org from Googles search engine. "Google Search Console" is a nice tool for that although it will take some time to get satisfying results... Regards, Matthias Am 10.05.2

Old AOO referencing in Google

2017-05-10 Thread Hagar Delest
A user raised this strange result: when performing a Google search with "openoffice download", the 3.4.1 version is the 3rd choice, this tends to present the 3.4.1 version as a not that old one. Is there a way to change that from the AOO site? See: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic

Re: License status of code from forum.openoffice.org without headers

2017-05-10 Thread Hagar Delest
Le 10/05/2017 à 14:52, Matthias Seidel a écrit : Until someone fixes the link in the forum I can enable a redirection... But maybe it should better be https://www.openoffice.org/license.html ? There is already a redirection from 2012 https://www.openoffice.org/terms_of_use.html but it is not wo

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-10 Thread esh1907
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > We are openly decleared dead. > Peter > > Why not keep the Open Office rights (so the TDF can not use them), but rename the project - perhaps a new name will resurrect the project?

Re: ooowiki continuation (was: Re: OpenOffice)

2017-05-10 Thread Simos Xenitellis
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> From: Simos Xenitellis [mailto:simos.li...@googlemail.com] > >> > Maybe I would also like to be a participant in the >> LibreOffice Certification >> > Program, but I am a free spirit and prerequisites such as a) in: >> > >> http://www.docume

Re: License status of code from forum.openoffice.org without headers

2017-05-10 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 10.05.2017 um 13:32 schrieb Hagar Delest: > Le 16/01/2016 à 22:43, Andrea Pescetti a écrit : >> Carl Marcum wrote: >>> On 01/15/2016 07:20 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Can code like this be used as-is in an Apache project? [1] https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2520 >> >>

Re: License status of code from forum.openoffice.org without headers

2017-05-10 Thread Hagar Delest
Le 16/01/2016 à 22:43, Andrea Pescetti a écrit : Carl Marcum wrote: On 01/15/2016 07:20 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Can code like this be used as-is in an Apache project? [1] https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2520 Your best option is probably to contact the author and ask him f