Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
> > For all practical purposes, TDF & LibO ignore both AOo and ASF. > Which demonstrates a no interest in Cooperation attitude. Thank you for pointing that out again. >If they stop declaring us dead, you made a step in the direction of > cooperation. > > The most noise about AOo being dead comes f

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Dave
Original Message From: Suhail Ansari To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 17:10:48 +0530 > Hi > TheASF has lots of important projects such as Tomcat, Hadoop etc. I > think that TheASF should either work with the document foundation or donate > open office tra

Re: Strange error while building OO for windows

2017-05-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Pavel, That sounds great! I did also finish my first build on Windows. According to your mail I took Java 1.7. Additionally I added German language and enabled dictionaries... Regards, Matthias Am 06.05.2017 um 09:40 schrieb Pavel Belski: > The 4.1.4 branch built normally > > 2017-05-05 17:

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2017 3:58 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: OpenOffice > > -1, for donation of Marketing right. Thats not helping > anyone. And will > only confuse people. Not everybody is happy with the TDF on User side. > +1 for Cooperation. Bu

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread toki
On 05/07/2017 01:58 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > We are openly declared dead. It is called evidence based observation. Specifically, looking at: * Time taken to fix zero day exploits; * Code contributions; * Percentage open bugs/total bugs; * Release schedule; * Axillary support; amongst other data

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
This implies that somehow the ASF, the foundation, allocates resources towards projects regarding who works where. That's not the case. It's not like "shutting down" AOO would result in the people working on it to be "re-assigned" to work on anything else like Tomcat or whatever, because that is no

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
-1, for donation of Marketing right. Thats not helping anyone. And will only confuse people. Not everybody is happy with the TDF on User side. +1 for Cooperation. But imho TDF is not interested. We are openly decleared dead. This is a clear sign that the Open Document Foundation is not interested i

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
-1 The AOO community doesn't necessarily participate in "Tomcat, Hadoop, etc.", and won't necessarily start if AOO is closed down. On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Suhail Ansari wrote: > Hi > TheASF has lots of important projects such as Tomcat, Hadoop etc. I > think that TheASF should eith

Re: OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Suhail Ansari [mailto:iamsuhailans...@gmail.com] > TheASF has lots of important projects such as Tomcat, > Hadoop etc. I > think that TheASF should either work with the document > foundation or donate > open office trademarks to the document foundation -1 The TDF has fo

OpenOffice

2017-05-07 Thread Suhail Ansari
Hi TheASF has lots of important projects such as Tomcat, Hadoop etc. I think that TheASF should either work with the document foundation or donate open office trademarks to the document foundation because you already have big active communities working in various projects and new projects like

Re: [Google+] Co-Admin?

2017-05-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
exactly. I plan to switch to my commiter Adress on the list. 2017-05-07 11:06 GMT+02:00 Matthias Seidel : > You refer to your gmail address? > > That would be the one I would add. > > I will write you a PM with the details. > > Matthias > > > Am 07.05.2017 um 11:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > > sure

Re: [Google+] Co-Admin?

2017-05-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
You refer to your gmail address? That would be the one I would add. I will write you a PM with the details. Matthias Am 07.05.2017 um 11:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > sure feel free. > I will remove this account from the list because I reorganize my email > handling. But the account will remain a

Re: [Google+] Co-Admin?

2017-05-07 Thread Peter Kovacs
sure feel free. I will remove this account from the list because I reorganize my email handling. But the account will remain active. All the best Peter 2017-05-07 10:57 GMT+02:00 Matthias Seidel : > Hi Peter, > > Thanks! > > My main concern is that I am the only one with access, now that Ariel i

Re: [Google+] Co-Admin?

2017-05-07 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Peter, Thanks! My main concern is that I am the only one with access, now that Ariel is absent. If I have an accident (I don't plan to!) we loose control to that page... Rob Weir is still "primary owner" so he would then be the last resort. If it's OK, I will give you administrative rights l