Re: [How to Cook a Release]

2016-10-14 Thread Marcus
Am 10/15/2016 12:49 AM, schrieb Marcus: Am 10/15/2016 12:20 AM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: On https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice the release should also be updated. "(The releases are taken from the listing in the DOAP)" @Andrea: You are listed as maintainer on the webpage. D

Re: [How to Cook a Release]

2016-10-14 Thread Marcus
Am 10/15/2016 12:20 AM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: On https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice the release should also be updated. "(The releases are taken from the listing in the DOAP)" @Andrea: You are listed as maintainer on the webpage. Do you still know what and where to updat

[How to Cook a Release]

2016-10-14 Thread Matthias Seidel
On https://projects.apache.org/project.html?openoffice the release should also be updated. "(The releases are taken from the listing in the DOAP)" regards Matthias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-14 Thread Peter Kovacs
Instead of Languages I rather would like to discuss overall architecture. The initial Architecture has not been changed much since it was introduced i think. But over time the requirements I see in the code have changed. Solving Requirements with code and without adjusting the architecture lea

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-14 Thread Marcus
Am 10/14/2016 01:19 AM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision should be added to Bugzilla so that bugs can be

Re: Mismatch in numbering

2016-10-14 Thread Matthias Seidel
OK, it is a technical restriction... That explains it. However it looks weird (by coincidence). ;-) regards Matthias Am 14.10.2016 um 20:18 schrieb Marcus: > Am 10/14/2016 01:35 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Why is the announcement for 4.1.3 on >> >> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announ

Re: Mismatch in numbering

2016-10-14 Thread Marcus
Am 10/14/2016 01:35 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel: Why is the announcement for 4.1.3 on https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_4_12 ? the blog software cannot produce URLs with more than 32 characters. The URL creation is taken from the headline. To avoid to produce the

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-14 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
This was discussed several times before. I was initially against the idea as Java can call C++ code easily these days (eg. JNA, BridJ), but changed my mind when I realized how developing OpenOffice itself in C/C++ is very difficult, and how much effort is wasted (portability (eg. Win64), problemat

Re: openoffice programming

2016-10-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 10/14/2016 3:24 AM, iamsuhailans...@gmail.com wrote: I have a suggestion that Apache should write OpenOffice using Java and Netbeans platform. Thanks for your suggestion. There would certainly be major advantages to it being in Java. We could do a single build for all platforms. Several fo

openoffice programming

2016-10-14 Thread iamsuhailansari
I have a suggestion that Apache should write OpenOffice using Java and Netbeans platform. Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Mismatch in numbering

2016-10-14 Thread Matthias Seidel
Why is the announcement for 4.1.3 on https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_4_12 ? Seems there is a mismatch in the numbering (same for 4.1.2 -> 4_11 and for 4.1.1 -> 4_1) Can we just copy https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing_apache_openoffice_4_12 to https:

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-14 Thread Pedro
On 14-10-2016 08:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the update script is usually done several days after the formal Release announceme

Re: Bugzilla needs version 4.1.3 added

2016-10-14 Thread Matthias Seidel
+1 ;-) Am 14.10.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > Marcus wrote: >> Am 10/13/2016 09:34 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >>> Marcus wrote: Am 10/13/2016 08:18 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: > With the announcement of the Release of version 4.1.3 that revision > should be added to

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-14 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the update script is usually done several days after the formal Release announcement so as to minimize the load on the mirrors.