Re: [NOMINATION REQUEST] Next Chair of AOO Project Management Committee

2016-09-14 Thread Carl Marcum
+1 Marcus, Thanks for volunteering !! Carl On 09/14/2016 02:36 PM, Marcus wrote: I could write much and more but to keep a long story short: I will volunteer to take over the role as next Chair. Planned is a time frame of 1 year. But of course also a bit longer if it fits better for any (ti

Re: dmake

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > epm is required and not under our control. In fact, epm 4.3 is out > and work much better for AOO since it removes the need for the > long-since deprecated PackageMaker app and instead uses the > official pkgbuild stuff. Part of my confi

Re: dmake

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:28 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Tarballs are at: >> https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases >> My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one >> "canonical" version we can use. > > Is there a reason for that? > The only

Re: building on Windows 10 breaks at guistdio.exe

2016-09-14 Thread John D'Orazio
If it can be of any use to understand better the problem, I'm using this configuration: SDK_PATH="D:\Microsoft_SDKs\Windows\v7.0" ./configure --with-frame-home="$SDK_PATH" --with-psdk-home="$SDK_PATH" --with-midl-path="$SDK_PATH/bin" --with-directx-home="D:\Microsoft_DirectX_SDK_June_2010" --with

Re: dmake

2016-09-14 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Jim Jagielski wrote: Tarballs are at: https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one "canonical" version we can use. Is there a reason for that? So far it has been enough for us to get a specific dmake tarball from a certain UR

Re: building on Windows 10 breaks at guistdio.exe

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I've never seen this failure before. The only suggestion I can make is to retry. That sometimes fixes failed builds. On 9/14/2016 12:39 PM, John D'Orazio wrote: ... dmake: '../../../wntmsci12.pro/bin/guistdio.exe' removed. 1 module(s): desktop need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR:

Re: dmake

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Tarballs are at: https://github.com/jimjag/dmake/releases My goal was to try to combine all the flavors of dmake into one "canonical" version we can use. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 3:12 PM, John D'Orazio > wrote: > > I myself just ran into the problem of the missing apache-extras link, I'v

building on Windows 10 breaks at guistdio.exe

2016-09-14 Thread John D'Orazio
So I've taken courage thanks also to the work done by Patricia Shanahan on building OpenOffice in Windows 7 and Windows 8.1. I'm using Windows 10, and I've sorted through the first few obstacles and my build has now been running for 5-6 hours without any trouble. Until now that is. It just broke wh

Re: I want to support OO development

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 9/14/2016 12:23 PM, John D'Orazio wrote: On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: In the long term, work on the build system would be extremely valuable. That would make it easier to convert initial interest to long term contributions. [...] I made some changes recent

Re: I want to support OO development

2016-09-14 Thread John D'Orazio
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > In the long term, work on the build system would be extremely valuable. > That would make it easier to convert initial interest to long term > contributions. > > [...] I made some changes recently to the step-by-step instructions fo

Re: dmake

2016-09-14 Thread John D'Orazio
I myself just ran into the problem of the missing apache-extras link, I've used a sourceforge link for my build: http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2. Most of the links indicated in your github repo's README are dead links... I believe a downloadable tarball is

Re: [NOMINATION REQUEST] Next Chair of AOO Project Management Committee

2016-09-14 Thread Marcus
I could write much and more but to keep a long story short: I will volunteer to take over the role as next Chair. Planned is a time frame of 1 year. But of course also a bit longer if it fits better for any (time) contraints. I don't want to write here what should be done better or faster or

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? > > 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut > off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but > I'm open to arguments. Have all of the necessary download site chang

4.1.3_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127113] Xcode 10.11 SDK not recognized

2016-09-14 Thread bugzilla
Patricia Shanahan has granted 4.1.3_release_blocker: Issue 127113: Xcode 10.11 SDK not recognized https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional co

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
Good argument. I've granted it 4.1.3 release blocker. On 9/14/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one stops configure in its tracks. On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: 4.1

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one stops configure in its tracks. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > 4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just > has the 10.11 SDX and configure

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just has the 10.11 SDX and configure doesn't see it and so the configure process dies. You have to hand edit configure to push thru. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? > >

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open to arguments. On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blo

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113 > On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch. > > --

Re: Status of ASF Ubuntu Buildbots

2016-09-14 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Gavin McDonald wrote: What we do have is two (imho) useless ‘snapshot’ builds (based on openoffice/tags/SNAPSHOT - Which hasn’t had a commit in 10 months and never will have because its a ‘tag’. ...which would be true if we were using SVN the textbook way, but for historical reasons we aren'

dmake

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Seeing that there is a dependency, still, on dmake, I've gone ahead and created https://github.com/jimjag/dmake based on what I've been using... Suggestions and patches welcome. Hoping we can use this to replace the apche-extras links. It's based on (https://github.com/mohawk2/dmake) --

4.1.3_release_blocker granted: [Issue 127112] Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.3 release

2016-09-14 Thread bugzilla
Patricia Shanahan has granted Ariel Constenla-Haile 's request for 4.1.3_release_blocker: Issue 127112: Update bundled dictionaries for AOO 4.1.3 release https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127112 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: