JZA wrote:
Wonder if there is something wrong wtih the forums?
Everything works correctly for me at
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewforum.php?f=7
and no outage notifications were sent. I also see a recent message
posted by you, so I assume this is fixed.
Regards,
Andrea.
---
Wonder if there is something wrong wtih the forums?
--
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
9060 55AB FFD2 2F02 0E1A 3409 599C 14FC 9450 D3CF
Oh, OK. Seems wordy for me. But +0.
I very much don't like the wide gray bar when a simple double-line is good
enough.
When I update the language entries for Linux, I will remove the gray bar. It
is awful.
- Dennis
> -Original Message-
> From: mar...@apache.org [mailto:mar...@apa
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 24/08/2016 Kay Schenk wrote:
>
>> Continuing discussion with infra due to EOL on both the systems we are
>> currently using indicates we will probably be moving to Ubuntu 14.04
>> buildbots for Linux 32 and Linux 64. I'll keep you updat
On 25 Aug, To: Don Lewis wrote:
> On 26 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 24/08/2016 Don Lewis wrote:
>>>* Updated bundled serf to fix a CVE and a WebDAV issue. The FreeBSD
>>> port has been using the system version of the latest and greatest.
>>
>> We've been discussing this separately.
On 25 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> 2. Update Java requirement from Java 1.5 to *at least* Java 1.7
>>> I am rather adamant that we change our building requirement to Java 1.7
>>> for all platforms. I will be changing that in our Building Guide today.
>>
>> Is there a real reason for it? I see t
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>
> with more language than now the link becomes longer and
> longer which is
> also not the best thing.
>
> I don't think that it's really necessary to show all languages in the
> link. A link text like "Download for all languages" should do
> t
On 26 Aug, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 24/08/2016 Don Lewis wrote:
>>* Updated bundled serf to fix a CVE and a WebDAV issue. The FreeBSD
>> port has been using the system version of the latest and greatest.
>
> We've been discussing this separately. This will make the build system
> eve
Thought I would mention that the Oracle folks are making noises about helping
developers move off of versions of Java < 1.7.
They are aware of increasing numbers of vulnerabilities in the older major
versions. Of course it isn't our job to nudge users off of XP and older Windows
OSes, or get t
On 24/08/2016 Kay Schenk wrote:
Continuing discussion with infra due to EOL on both the systems we are
currently using indicates we will probably be moving to Ubuntu 14.04
buildbots for Linux 32 and Linux 64. I'll keep you updated.
For the same reason, wouldn't it be better to move to 16.04 LTS
On 24/08/2016 Don Lewis wrote:
* Updated bundled serf to fix a CVE and a WebDAV issue. The FreeBSD
port has been using the system version of the latest and greatest.
We've been discussing this separately. This will make the build system
even more complex, but it does have advantages a
Resending to 3 lists... I suggest to have a "canonical" reply-to to the
dev list for the next messages. Andrea
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/08/2016 Kay Schenk wrote:
WARNING: This is quite long!
And the discussion was even longer, but I'll start with answering this one.
And I'll first note
Am 08/25/2016 11:22 PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
I've merged both tables into a single one. Now we have really
one style.
fine.
This is now meticulous, but please name the entries in column "Zip file"
uniform, for exemple from top to bottom:
Downloa
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> I've merged both tables into a single one. Now we have really
> one style.
fine.
This is now meticulous, but please name the entries in column "Zip file"
uniform, for exemple from top to bottom:
Download (en-US)
Download (nl)
Download (en-US &
Hi again;
...
I did update most of the components you mention and even gave a talk
about it ;).
It looks like the others are:
ucpp
We are using the latest version.
Hmn, I wonder why the FreeBSD port is using the bundled one.
I think we just don't have an option in AOO to use an e
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 11:37
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-
> patch1 Hotfixes
>
> Am 08/25/2016 06:43 PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
> >> Fro
Am 08/25/2016 06:43 PM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Yes, now I understand.
Is it better now?
_imho_ yes.
I've merged both tables into a single one. Now we have really one style.
Furthermore, I've added also a note that the hotfix is *no
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Yes, now I understand.
>
> Is it better now?
_imho_ yes.
Jörg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: de
On 08/24/2016 07:42 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2016-08-23, 1:14 PM Kay sch...@apache.org wrote concerning "[DISCUSS]
> Release 4.2: General Topics":
>
>> 2. Update Java requirement from Java 1.5 to*at least* Java 1.7
>
> I replied earlier using gmane, but it doesn't seem to have gone through
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 07:09
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOpenOffice 4.1.2-
> patch1 Hotfixes
>
[ ... ]
>
> Sorry, but
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> This will not work. Only for Windows does each language have
> a separate .zip.
>
> For MacOSX and the Linux packages, there are multiple README
> files but only one .zip per platform. (All versions of the
> README are in the sing
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 01:47
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org; l...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of ApacheOp
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:12 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org; l...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of
> ApacheOpenOffice 4.1
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:12 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org; l...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of
> ApacheOpenOffice 4.1
24 matches
Mail list logo
