>>
>
> Hi all--
>
> I am volunteering to be release manager for 4.2.0. I have been involved
> in all the AOO releases since 3.40, and I'm familiar with the process.
> Like all of us involved with the project, I am a volunteer. Due to this,
> I can not provide an expected release date. Releases,
On 08/19/2016 01:41 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all-- I am volunteering to be release manager for 4.2.0. I have
been involved in all the AOO releases since 3.40, and I'm familiar
with the process. Like all of us involved with the project, I am a
volunteer. Due to this, I can not provide
Am 08/19/2016 07:41 PM, schrieb Kay sch...@apache.org:
On 01/28/2016 04:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
As I wrote a few day ago, in theory it would be good to release
OpenOffice 4.2.0 in February. If it happens a bit later it wouldn't be a
big issue, but I believe that, in the constant balance b
On 8/19/2016 2:57 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
...
Hmn, I see that the error that you are seeing is coming from set_soenv
and not configure. Did you rerun autoconf to regenerate configure after
the update?
...
A very good question. Reminder-to-self: Use the step-by-step
instructions rather than relyi
On 19 Aug, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/2016 12:51 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 19 Aug, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>>> I did an "svn update". Now configure is failing:
>>>
>>>
>>> *
[BCC PMC, FYI QA]
At this time, the preparation and dev@/qa@ confirmation of the AOO 4.1.2-patch1
Hotfixes has quieted.
I propose that the current binaries be placed into general availability. I am
initiating lazy consensus to end not before Tuesday, 2016-08-23T22:00Z.
MATERIALS TO BE AVAILA
On 8/19/2016 12:51 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 19 Aug, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I did an "svn update". Now configure is failing:
* *
* Setting up the build envir
On 19 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote:
> On 19 Aug, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> Great commit messages!
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: truck...@apache.org [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:28
>>> To: comm...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: s
On 19 Aug, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Great commit messages!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: truck...@apache.org [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:28
>> To: comm...@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1756954 [1/2] - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./
Great commit messages!
> -Original Message-
> From: truck...@apache.org [mailto:truck...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 11:28
> To: comm...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1756954 [1/2] - in /openoffice/trunk/main: ./
> openssl/
>
> Author: truckman
> Date: Fri
On 19 Aug, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I did an "svn update". Now configure is failing:
>
>
> * *
> * Setting up the build environment variables.
I did an "svn update". Now configure is failing:
* *
* Setting up the build environment variables.*
*
On 15 Aug, Marcus wrote:
> Am 08/15/2016 10:16 PM, schrieb Don Lewis:
>> I started working on upgrading the bundled version of openssl to 1.0.2h.
>> So far I've discovered that building in on Windows requires nasm. That
>> will need to be documented in the build requirements / procedures. I
>> th
On 8/19/2016 10:41 AM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote:
On 01/28/2016 04:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
As I wrote a few day ago, in theory it would be good to release
OpenOffice 4.2.0 in February. If it happens a bit later it wouldn't be a
big issue, but I believe that, in the constant balance be
Marcus wrote:
> Am 08/19/2016 01:09 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46
>>> To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Appl
On 01/28/2016 04:06 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> As I wrote a few day ago, in theory it would be good to release
> OpenOffice 4.2.0 in February. If it happens a bit later it wouldn't be a
> big issue, but I believe that, in the constant balance between periods
> where we are focused on talks (inte
> -Original Message-
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 09:09
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Ready to setup release build machines?
>
>
>
> On 08/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > I thought that the basic requi
On 08/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> I thought that the basic requirement is that the release manager(s) do any
> builds on a machine under their [exclusive] individual control. That also
> means satisfying baseline requirements for release builds though. That
> pretty much re
Am 08/19/2016 01:09 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:40
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage
Am 08/15/2016 11:40 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Ham
Am 08/19/2016 01:09 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Wi
20 matches
Mail list logo
