Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Nor I.
>
> My humble apologies, Keith.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 15:41
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New PMC Member Keith N. McNamara
>>
>> Andrea Pe
Nor I.
My humble apologies, Keith.
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 15:41
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New PMC Member Keith N. McNamara
>
> Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > On 21/03/2016 Dennis E
Am 03/22/2016 08:08 PM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Hi
For the past month I've been working on preparing the gbuild branch
for merge into trunk, and I believe it to be essentially ready.
My work can be found in branches/gbuild-reintegration which started as
a branch of trunk to which all patches
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 11:30
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> Am 03/22/2016 06:34 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> > On 3/22/2016 9:25 AM,
Am 03/22/2016 09:08 PM, schrieb Pedro Giffuni:
+1
I have been following the branch and it looks well.
Also, ydario@ was contacted about the OS/2 builds and I am sure he will
catch up.
I did most of the illumos changes that I considered portable enough and
didn't
break tests so I think they will
Am 03/22/2016 10:04 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 03/22/2016 09:37 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 03/22/2016 04:48 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Many interesting ideas, ...
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 03:35
To: dev@openoffice.apa
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 21/03/2016 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> A warm (belated) welcome to Keith McNamera
>
> McKenna. And welcome Keith!
>
> http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=openoffice has the right
> name (and by the way it is the new page for the "official" PMC list,
> replacin
On 3/22/2016 3:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 21/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 3/20/2016 10:02 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
I would have liked to attend but my TAC application wasn't successful.
TAC was apparently faced with an unusually large number of high quality
applications, and had to
On 21/03/2016 Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
A warm (belated) welcome to Keith McNamera
McKenna. And welcome Keith!
http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=openoffice has the right
name (and by the way it is the new page for the "official" PMC list,
replacing
http://people.apache.org/committ
On 21/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 3/20/2016 10:02 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
I would have liked to attend but my TAC application wasn't successful.
TAC was apparently faced with an unusually large number of high quality
applications, and had to tighten their criteria
...and we have the op
On 03/22/2016 09:37 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 03/22/2016 04:48 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
>> Many interesting ideas, ...
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 03:35
>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re:
On 03/21/2016 06:14 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
> When building OpenOffice with recent versions of clang, an extreme
> number of very verbose warnings are generated by the Boost headers,
> which basically doubles the size of the build log.
>
> For the FreeBSD port, which uses the system Boost (still 1.5
+1
I have been following the branch and it looks well.
Also, ydario@ was contacted about the OS/2 builds and I am sure he will
catch up.
I did most of the illumos changes that I considered portable enough and
didn't
break tests so I think they will catch up too.
For a future wishlist (yeah .
Hi
For the past month I've been working on preparing the gbuild branch
for merge into trunk, and I believe it to be essentially ready.
My work can be found in branches/gbuild-reintegration which started as
a branch of trunk to which all patches from branches/gbuild patches
were gradually merged,
Am 03/22/2016 06:34 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 3/22/2016 9:25 AM, Marcus wrote:
...
OK, it seems you also like the idea to have another resolution status -
it just depends on what the name is, right? ;-)
...
How about RESOLVED - WENEEDPEOPLE for issues where we would like to do a
fix or
On 3/22/2016 9:25 AM, Marcus wrote:
...
OK, it seems you also like the idea to have another resolution status -
it just depends on what the name is, right? ;-)
...
How about RESOLVED - WENEEDPEOPLE for issues where we would like to do a
fix or enhancement, and are only being prevented by lack
Am 03/22/2016 04:48 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Many interesting ideas, ...
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 03:35
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
On 03
Am 03/22/2016 11:56 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:
It seems to me that RESOLVED - RESOLVED is too mysterious and RESOLVED
- NOTOURBUG is not much better than NOTANISSUE.
RESOLVED - HANDLED might be closer, with the comment that achieves
this explains how it is handled. (I.e., documentation, workaround
Many interesting ideas, ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 03:35
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
>
> On 03/22/2016 05:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
> > Am 0
Hi Don;
The right thing would be to update boost, however this usually involves
checking
that builds continue to work for other platforms, including the old MSVC
compiler
we use for AOO.
Of course we have buildbots for that, but generally I am afraid it may
be work that
doesn't pay on the lo
On 03/22/2016 05:02 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add th
On 03/21/2016 10:37 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 15:30
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
[ ... ]
I have been guilty of cre
Hi Jakub
Welcome to Apache OpenOffice. We appreciate all contributions.
You should probably start by checking the source code out of SVN and
getting it to compile:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
There is some documentation on how Calc works on
https://wiki.open
Am 03/22/2016 10:00 AM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone f
Am 03/22/2016 03:37 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Lino [mailto:pedl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 16:53
To: q...@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can we add the value "N/A" to the Target Milestone field
It's not about to draw the line be
Am 03/22/2016 12:52 AM, schrieb Pedro Lino:
It's not about to draw the line between issues that are resolved and
verified solutions. It's about to differentiate issues that are in the real
application and therefore need to be fixed in the source code. Here we use
(or better should use) RESOLVED -
Hello,
My name is bc. Jakub Máša and I would like to contribute into this project.
I'm a student at CTU (4th year) and I need to prove my skills by
contributing to big open source project. I also work for 3 years in
middle-size commercial company as .Net and C++ developer, therefore I am
used to
27 matches
Mail list logo
