On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hi Damjan and others;
>
> Indeed a new build system is very desirable but it is difficult to
> choose one. I agree that choosing one which we already have a need
> for in dependencies is wise.
>
> FWIW, I looked into some of the options mysel
Hmm, have to think about the IDE question. I'm a yes and no about that. IDEs
should be usable. I'm not so clear that one should be essential to do a plain
build of the product from source.
I prefer command-line builds on Windows, although I use IDEs to edit and to do
local builds of things t
On 2/5/2016 6:01 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Patricia .. good point about IDE's.
We have a dilemma here:
On one side ~80% of our users are Windows-based so it would certainly
be ideal to use an environment where we keep both our users and our
developers in sync. Unfortunately the majority of ou
Hi Patricia .. good point about IDE's.
We have a dilemma here:
On one side ~80% of our users are Windows-based so it would certainly
be ideal to use an environment where we keep both our users and our
developers in sync. Unfortunately the majority of our developers are
not Windows based so ideal
I think Marcus raises important points about capacity and how we could
bootstrap through this.
Some musings:
There are also some related activities that need to follow in some manner, such
as changing deployment for Windows and probably for OSX too, both for similar
reasons. Getting into the
It is interesting how Cordova and Flex are different, but are concerned with
client-facing technologies.
Apache OpenOffice is probably the most heavily-client project that the ASF has,
and Corinthia, had it endured, would be somewhere between these two kinds of
client worlds.
I can imagine an
I thought most windows developers were more IDE orientated than command
line, so we should be considering selecting an IDE for Windows builds,
and as many others as possible, and putting together the project files
for it.
Parallelism is far, far lower priority than reliable unattended
buildin
Hi Damjan and others;
Indeed a new build system is very desirable but it is difficult to
choose one. I agree that choosing one which we already have a need
for in dependencies is wise.
FWIW, I looked into some of the options myself:
- Google's Bazel looked very promising:
http://bazel.io/
But i
Am 02/05/2016 07:32 PM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Hi
With the recent buildbot saga and Patricia's Windows building nightmare, a
number of serious issues were highlighted which got me thinking about how
our build system could be improved.
The problems with building AOO were researched and docume
Hi
With the recent buildbot saga and Patricia's Windows building nightmare, a
number of serious issues were highlighted which got me thinking about how
our build system could be improved.
The problems with building AOO were researched and documented years ago (
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Bu
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Hi Patricia,
>
> Patricia Shanahan schrieb:
>
>> My build finished!
>>
>> The next problem is to run it. I have hit two problems, one minor. The
>> minor problem is that
>>
>> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AO
Hi Patricia,
Patricia Shanahan schrieb:
My build finished!
The next problem is to run it. I have hit two problems, one minor. The
minor problem is that
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7
has incorrect paths using "OpenOffice" rather than "Ap
My build finished!
The next problem is to run it. I have hit two problems, one minor. The
minor problem is that
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7
has incorrect paths using "OpenOffice" rather than "Apache_OpenOffice".
The more serious pr
On 02/04/2016 03:48 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Summary:
1. I think the use of the openoffice "class path" and packaging that is
already accepted for use be continued, rather than disturb the Java and maven identifiers
that people are already using and expect.
2. Creating a distribution
14 matches
Mail list logo
