Am 08/29/2015 12:11 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The three patches for the "basic" part are probably easier to understand
separately:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1583558&r2=1602195&path
In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is
currently and that there is an urgent need to turn down the number of mails.
Marcus
Am 08/28/2015 11:58 PM, schrieb Phillip Rhodes:
So what, if anything, shoul
I've heard that it is a whole lot and much more that the PMC policies warrant.
I dug into this to find out exactly what "a whole lot" is and whether it is a
way to demonstrate, without breaching confidentiality, when activity more
aligned with the policy is reached over time.
Thanks for your qu
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> The three patches for the "basic" part are probably easier to understand
>> separately:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1
On 26/08/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
The three patches for the "basic" part are probably easier to understand
separately:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO410/main/instsetoo_native/util/openoffice.lst?r1=1583558&r2=1602195&pathrev=1602195&diff_format=h
https://svn.apache.org/v
So what, if anything, should we take away from this? My (completely
superficial, naive and uninformed) feeling is that that is a LOT of traffic
on the "private" list. But maybe not. Anyway, is the idea here that there
should be less traffic on that list? More? The same?
I have to admit, I've be
With a correction already,
Of all the messages sent,
84.3% are by members of the PMC,
13.4% are by other ASF participants, and
2.3% are by others.
[The extra decimals are simply to achieve a confirmable total of 100%,
precision not so much.]
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E.
>From an AOO PMC Member,
I have compiled a high-level traffic analysis of discussion activity on the
OpenOffice PMC private@ oo.a.o list. These are *statistics* and noisy ones at
that. I am looking for trends that are good-enough at this level of precision.
It is in the nature of private@ th
On 08/27/2015 09:05 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am in the process of migrating our unit tests from cppunit to Google
> Test. However AOO doesn't build with cppunit and hasn't been routinely
> built with cppunit for a while, which means our unit tests are in a
> state of neglect, and un
+1
Thank you for working on this. Having working unit tests is key for
future development!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
2015-08-28 15:38 GMT+02:00 toki :
> On 26/08/15 00:56, Tony Stevenson wrote:
>
> >> I don't want to have my communications to now be taken with
> >> more authority than they would were I not the Chair.
> >
> > For anyone who knows how the ASF works they will know that this is not
> > even possible
On 26/08/15 00:56, Tony Stevenson wrote:
>> I don't want to have my communications to now be taken with
>> more authority than they would were I not the Chair.
>
> For anyone who knows how the ASF works they will know that this is not
> even possible. As you are no more senior, and therefore c
12 matches
Mail list logo
