Thanks a lot everybody!
On Friday, 7 August 2015 6:41 PM, Albino B Neto wrote:
2015-08-06 16:50 GMT-03:00 jan i :
> Welcome to Manik Malhotra who just accepting being openoffice committer.
Congratulations!
--
Albino B Neto
twitter.com/b1n0anb
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to fre
The Buildbot working for 'ASF Buildbot'
has noticed that the buildslave named aoo_mac-mini went away
It last disconnected at Sat Aug 8 03:59:25 2015 (buildmaster-local time)
The admin on record (as reported by BUILDSLAVE:info/admin)
was 'Apache OpenOffice
'.
Sincerely,
The Buildbot
http://ci
Hi all,
I have been a silent reader of all the mails on this list. I have been
reading these "read only" errors in past few days and I wanted to share my
experience with windows.
When I had windows 8 then every now and then some of my files which were in
C drive turned to read only. After that I st
Am 08/07/2015 09:43 PM, schrieb Janet Monk:
Since installing Windows 10 all my Open Office files have become “read
only” and can not be edited or saved in Documents and my databases seem to
be blocked. How can I resolve this problem?
thanks for your report. Currently we cannot reproduce reports
Since installing Windows 10 all my Open Office files have become “read
only” and can not be edited or saved in Documents and my databases seem to
be blocked. How can I resolve this problem?
Regards/Janet Monk
@Andrea:
As it is in your area to finally decide on issues for 4.1.2, what do you
think?
Thanks
Marcus
Am 08/06/2015 01:20 PM, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org:
Marcus has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker:
Issue 126447: When using LanguageTools, toggling the checkbox "check grammar"
in the spe
On 08/06/2015 07:31 AM, Ivanka Skakun wrote:
> Hello sirs,
>
> First of all, thank you for developing such a useful Software. Very good
> features and easy in use.
>
> Due to my volunteering program I translate tutorials, faq pages into
> Russian and would be really glad to translate your FAQ
Am 08/07/2015 09:50 AM, schrieb Michal Hriň:
Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
is
made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make
a
release candidate or started voting on a release candidate.
Is this coordinated with the release manager
On Aug 7, 2015 12:04 PM, "Marcus" wrote:
>
>
>
> Maybe Jan was afraid that a new version could come into the public too
early, others can see it as new release - and then the problem is just
starting: we have to deny this, discussions here and there, and nobody
wants to have this mess.
>
I would
Am 08/07/2015 05:22 PM, schrieb Rich Bowen:
On 08/07/2015 04:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 07/08/15 09:50, Michal Hriň wrote:
Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
is
made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make
a
release candidate
On Friday, August 7, 2015, Rich Bowen > wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2015 04:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On 07/08/15 09:50, Michal Hriň wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
>>> is
>>> made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to m
On 08/07/2015 04:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 07/08/15 09:50, Michal Hriň wrote:
Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
is
made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make
a
release candidate or started voting on a release candidate.
Is
2015-08-06 16:50 GMT-03:00 jan i :
> Welcome to Manik Malhotra who just accepting being openoffice committer.
Congratulations!
--
Albino B Neto
twitter.com/b1n0anb
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" faw
-
To unsubscrib
Am 08/07/2015 10:20 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
jan i wrote:
Is this coordinated with the release manager for 4.1.2 ?
No. It doesn't need to be. Maybe some confusion arose because Michal
wrote "4.1.2 Early Preview" here and somebody may find the name
confusing, but this is clearly "Michal's b
On Friday, August 7, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> Is this coordinated with the release manager for 4.1.2 ?
>>
>
> No. It doesn't need to be. Maybe some confusion arose because Michal wrote
> "4.1.2 Early Preview" here and somebody may find the name confusing, but
> this is cle
jan i wrote:
Is this coordinated with the release manager for 4.1.2 ?
No. It doesn't need to be. Maybe some confusion arose because Michal
wrote "4.1.2 Early Preview" here and somebody may find the name
confusing, but this is clearly "Michal's build of the current state of
4.1.2" and it is O
On 07/08/15 09:50, Michal Hriň wrote:
> Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
> is
> made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make
> a
> release candidate or started voting on a release candidate.
>
> Is this coordinated with the release ma
Thanks for providing a binary, but I am a bit concerned that a version
is
made public, before the PMC have even spoken about being ready to make
a
release candidate or started voting on a release candidate.
Is this coordinated with the release manager for 4.1.2 ?
Please do not misunderstand me, I
Am 08/06/2015 09:11 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
Marcus, the queries I did for identification of open issues found only
> issues with no resolution of any kind. That automatically excluded
> issues with any of DUPLICATE, ..., WON'T FIX, and CLOSED status.
OK
Older open issues, some from l
19 matches
Mail list logo
