Re: How to commit changes to 410 branch?

2015-07-10 Thread Kay Schenk
On 07/10/2015 12:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 09/07/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: >> It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. > > Yes we are. It's not the 410 branch, it's the "AOO410" branch and even > though the naming is unfortunate and frankly speaking I do not like i

Re: Are the Buildbots down?

2015-07-10 Thread Kay Schenk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/09/2015 02:57 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >> On 9 Jul 2015, at 9:26 am, Regina Henschel >> mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de>> >> wrote: >> >> JZA schrieb: >>> Hi wonder if the Nightly builds down for AOO? >>> >> >> Yes there are problems. You

[api] WrappedTargetException accessing modules in Basic libraries

2015-07-10 Thread Winfried Rohr
Hi, I'm writing a Python script, trying to access all Basic modules from files in a directory. In most cases I get a WrappedTargetException accessing the module(s) from a Basic library [line: txt = one_lib.getByName(m)] ... approx. 30% of modules are retrieved and printed. "xdoc" is referenc

Re: Permissions in Bugzilla

2015-07-10 Thread Marcus
Am 07/10/2015 09:04 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: May I have permission to manage the "Release blocker flag" in Bugzilla? I mean, for example, to turn the "?" in https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281 (4.1.2_release_blocker) to a "+". This will help a lot when discussing which fixes to

Permissions in Bugzilla

2015-07-10 Thread Andrea Pescetti
May I have permission to manage the "Release blocker flag" in Bugzilla? I mean, for example, to turn the "?" in https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126281 (4.1.2_release_blocker) to a "+". This will help a lot when discussing which fixes to bring into 4.1.2. We are going to use exactly

Re: How to commit changes to 410 branch?

2015-07-10 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 09/07/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: It seems we are still using the 410 branch for the 4.1.2 release. Yes we are. It's not the 410 branch, it's the "AOO410" branch and even though the naming is unfortunate and frankly speaking I do not like it and I would have preferred a dedicated "AOO412" branc