On 23/02/15 17:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I have to state it again: this is not the way I would have written the
> page; it is a version of the page that preserves all terms we had on
> that page. If we agree on another version I'm very happy.
Is there a need/requirement to preserve all the ter
Logan has asked for review:
Issue 125498: Dead search engines
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125498
Attachment 84532: Removes obsolete search engines.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=84532&action=edit
--- Comment #6 from Logan ---
Created attachment 84532
--> https:/
I see there is some wordsmithing discussion going on concerning the draft from
Andreas. I confess that it is difficult for me to contribute to that
considering that I find the entire activity one that requires a more global
perspective.
Here are a few observations. I am afraid I have nothing
Sounds good. Thanks for your work.
I don't know if the last 1-2 paragraphs are still not "Apache-friendly"
enough. Maybe it's better to avoid to state explicitely the anmes (and
abbreviations). Of course, here others can judge better. ;-)
Marcus
Am 02/23/2015 01:15 AM, schrieb Andrea Pesce
Thx for the discussion and the work. It is greatly appreciated.
With that said, I still don't see the need or rationale for the
"##For Developers" section. Removing the last 2 paragraphs
would go a long way in keeping the narrative closer to the
kind of discussion and info that the ASF is known fo
On 23/02/15 17:44, Mike Cheung wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi, anyone knows if there are anything like Doxygen for OpenOffice? Am
> trying to learn how the Calc spreadsheet works by looking at the code on
> FishEye but it is rather difficult to work through the logic and dig through
> all the hxx and cxx
On 23.02.2015 17:41, Rob Weir wrote:
> [ ] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the
> tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken.
>
> 4 PMC votes for this option: Rob,Marcus, Kay and Juergen
Here's another vote (binding) for this alternative.
>
> It looks like Andrea is
It's part of the Go-OO project; apologies for mistakenly contacting
you regarding them. Sounds like we'll probably end up turning them off
and decommissioning them.
Justin
[1]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go-oo
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Could these be abandoned
