jan i wrote:
It seems (as usual) that the discussion has died out, and nobody does
anything (my apologies in advance I am wrong, I would very much like to be
wrong).
You are wrong (so it's good news!), but not so much. I started looking
at it only 2 days ago and I didn't get far enough yet. I'
On 13/12/2014 jan i wrote:
8.1 and above, it complains when you start the exe after installation.
To people who were waiting for developments in this discussion: a new
one ("Digital signing release for windows") has been started, so please
follow it and I'll post my replies there too. See als
Thanks Jan,
It would be a great help to have links to the posts that document your findings
so that someone else could follow in your footsteps and especially figure out
what the problem is with Windows 8.1 rejecting unsigned files.
May I impose on you for that, please?
I see your 2014-12-09 p
On 25 December 2014 at 20:17, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>
>
> -- in reply below --
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:13
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> Subject: Re: Digital signing release for windows.
>
> On Thursday, Decemb
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
> [Not cross-posting to private@.]
>
> -- replying to --
> From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:20
> To: OOo Apache
> Cc: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; privateAOO
> Subject: Re: Deflecting the
> It is correct that you will find many XML based documents that refer
to DTD
> documents, actually it is a part of XML standard to do so.
>
> But that does not mean that scripts or programs use these files. They are
> often (and in case of AOO it is so) included just as a reference for
> defining
Hi Lee,
Lee Fisher schrieb:
Hi,
Where can I find these DTDs:
libraries.dtd
library.dtd
module.dtd
scripting.dtd
You can search the code with http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/ and
look into the files.
In this case you will find, that the first three are in
main/xmlscript/dt
On 25 December 2014 at 21:18, Lee Fisher wrote:
> I got a dump of 250MB of ODF files from the AOO bug database, via Rob,
> the ODF subset used for his recent Peach fuzzing.
>
> There are very few examples of scripts. All of the examples I've found
> to date use these XML files, which refer to the
Hello Lee,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 11:40:59AM -0800, Lee Fisher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I find these DTDs:
>
> libraries.dtd
> library.dtd
> module.dtd
> scripting.dtd
You can use http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/
Select aoo-trunk "In Projec(s)" and put the filename in "File Path"
I got a dump of 250MB of ODF files from the AOO bug database, via Rob,
the ODF subset used for his recent Peach fuzzing.
There are very few examples of scripts. All of the examples I've found
to date use these XML files, which refer to these DTD files.
I have not see any other script files which
Hi Oliver,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 08:51:03PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
> Hi Ariel,
>
>
> >merry xmas to you too, and have fun building :)
>
> i worked :-)
>
> ./configure \
> --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)")" \
> --with-vendor="My AOO Debug Build" \
> -
The files listed below are not conventional files used in ODF packages. The
basic ODF files do not use DTDs and files by those names are not part of the
standard ODF document structure. While there might be other files in an ODF
package, usually XML files are expected to conform to [xml-names]
Hi Ariel,
merry xmas to you too, and have fun building :)
i worked :-)
./configure \
--with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)")" \
--with-vendor="My AOO Debug Build" \
--with-dmake-url="http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2";
\
--with
Hi,
Where can I find these DTDs:
libraries.dtd
library.dtd
module.dtd
scripting.dtd
These are used in ODF packages for the script-lb.xml, script-lc.xml, and
parcel-description.xml files. Besides the DTDs, are there any specs that
describe the format of these 3 XML files?
I haven't found
-- in reply below --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:13
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: Digital signing release for windows.
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
[ ... ]
>
>The official ke
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> It occurs to me that nagging the list about things is not moving the ball
> forward. I suggest that is not useful and it would be valuable to stay
> constructive or even request assistance.
I agree with you, but sometimes you need to
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>
>
> -- replying to --
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org ]
> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 07:51
> To: dev
> Subject: Digital signing release for windows.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> My suggestion is simple, lets rerun AOO 4.1 for windows, s
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I screwed up big time.
>
> My carelessness in not correcting the To: address is inexcusable.
not a problem for me, especially because it gives me a chance to write
something I have wanted to in a long time.
>
> Jan, I am very sorry.
I screwed up big time.
My carelessness in not correcting the To: address is inexcusable.
Jan, I am very sorry.
In the future, I will not use any "Reply" buttons to move off-list. That way
I'll have to get the address correct.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [m
It occurs to me that nagging the list about things is not moving the ball
forward. I suggest that is not useful and it would be valuable to stay
constructive or even request assistance.
Your offer is interesting. Andrea has the key for AOO.
Don't forget that all of the languages need to be
-- replying to --
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 07:51
To: dev
Subject: Digital signing release for windows.
[ ... ]
My suggestion is simple, lets rerun AOO 4.1 for windows, sign it digitally,
and then release it as a patch version.
I am happy to help,
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 04:57:25PM +0100, jan i wrote:
> I thought we decided to remove "wiki-publisher" when we released 4.0,
> for 2 reasons it is a plugin and the licensetext does not seem updated.
It is an extension; as such, it has never been part of a release, not
even on Sun/Oracle era. Any
On 25 December 2014 at 00:42, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I finished checking on the Java-specific messages and the six messages
> only have a single place where each is produced.
>
> It appears that a single (default en) page could provide the necessary
> information for reference from any messa
On 23 December 2014 at 15:29, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 08:29:54PM +0100, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
> > What build settings are neede fpr an release build?
>
> These are my (old) configure options for a non-pro build (for a release
> build, remove the last three):
>
> ./
Hi.
It seems (as usual) that the discussion has died out, and nobody does
anything (my apologies in advance I am wrong, I would very much like to be
wrong).
Digital signing was and is a major theme for AOO. In fact AOO and Tomcat
was to be the 2 start/test applications for Apache. Infra has inves
Andrea, I have already fixed it on build 68.
It now displays combined prefixes at the bottom of the derivates panel.
I have compiled a build 70 to fix some little bugs, which will be
available when I update my site on the 1st of January.
I have also written a guide about how to install the di
26 matches
Mail list logo
