Hello,
Am 20.04.2014 21:41, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>
> On 04/20/2014 11:53 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>
>> On 20 Apr 2014, at 14:02, Hagar Delest
>> wrote:
> ...well this is an interesting statement.
>
> Getting back to both this and Hagar's response. If we see that getting
> AOO back int
Top post….
I propose that in addition to reaching out to distros we also look to
enterprise installations; and that we also work closely (if possible) with the
Linux Foundation.
As to enterprise Linux distributions…. Besides RHEL, there is Univention's
Univention Corporate Server. I mention th
On 29/03/2014 Tal Daniel wrote:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/HowToFileIssue ...
(1) What happens NOW, after a bug is created? -- Does someone review it and
assign it, or should the reporter notify a mailing list, next to promote
it? Do BugZilla Admins review the bugs?
The Issues mailing
On 28/03/2014 Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Case_Management
Needs some rework before we can add a Link to Bugzilla Component. I am
not familiar with that stuff.
That page has absolutely nothing good. Quaste and TCM are things from
the past. And you know it perfe
On 30/03/2014 Hagar Delest wrote:
Andrea commented the JIRA ticket and a patch will be added. Thanks!
It's still a failure since it took way too long, but the patch is now
online: the default mail notification preference on the forum is set to
ON as requested some dozens times by Hagar and ot
I agree there should be a more concerted efforts to add desktop
specific features (not only distros). Meaning a better integration
with KDE and Gnome notification system and others. Having libraries
that can route messages to the Kdialog (from the libnotify library)
and Gnome's Notifications.
The
On 04/20/2014 11:53 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 20 Apr 2014, at 14:02, Hagar Delest
wrote:
IMHO, most users just take what's provided by default. Unless it is
too buggy. So I think that basically, we are back to the question:
why AOO is still not available in the standard packages?
On 20 Apr 2014, at 14:02, Hagar Delest wrote:
> IMHO, most users just take what's provided by default. Unless it is too buggy.
> So I think that basically, we are back to the question: why AOO is still not
> available in the standard packages?
There are several ways of answering your question
Le 19/04/2014 01:53, Kay Schenk a écrit :
Ok, maybe the subject is bit melodramatic but after some of the twisted
things we read about, basically how non-supportive either AOO is of Linux,
or Linux is non-supportive of AOO, here's what I'm thinking.
1) We do a blog whose main subject is AOO and
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 2:04 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As far as I can see, the Apache CMS will not work properly.
>
> I have performed a commit:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1588728
>
> However, getting to the staging page no display.
>
> What's going on? Can
Hello,
As far as I can see, the Apache CMS will not work properly.
I have performed a commit:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1588728
However, getting to the staging page no display.
What's going on? Can I do anything?
If it is the same problem which is discussed on t
on Friday, April 18, 2014 4:06 PM Rob Weir wrote:
> > What do you think what is the target group that is? Only
> project members, or interested OpenOffice users [*] who want
> to stay up to date?
> >
>
> I think it would be a mix of two audiences:
>
> 1) Project members who focus on one are of
12 matches
Mail list logo
