Jürgen Schmidt schrieb:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
(RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta. The Beta release is intended to
reach more early adopters and to receive more valuable feedback to
improve potentially critical areas for the final release.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate
> (RC) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 Beta. The Beta release is intended to
> reach more early adopters and to receive more valuable feedback to
> improve potential
On 06/03/2014 jan i wrote:
On 6 March 2014 00:03, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
- All speakers are invited to promote their talk, the OpenOffice track and
the conference in general via social media, blogs and other channels.
Should we make 1 blog on our blog telling that we have a whole track monday
a
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> Time to wrap this up. I've gone through the 275 questions from 430
> users and picked out the top ones. I dropped the ones that repeated
> questions we already answered in our last iteration of this. I also
> combined questions where there w
Rob Weir wrote:
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/using_md5sums.html
This gets around 90 visits per day, almost all are referrals from
Google searches.
OK, I agree it should be killed by deleting it then.
Of course, internal link from openoffice.org pages to
http://www.openoffice.org/dev_doc
Hi all,
last weekend I wanted to check whether I can try to use 4.1 for my daily
work with acceptable risk. Using such a trunk version for normal work is
a much more manifold and reliable test than testing with prepared
testcases (what, of course, have to be done, too!).
I am used to do a q
