Am 10/23/2013 12:04 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensenwrote:
Howdy Rob,
Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
"IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
FYI on the existing consultant entries
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Howdy Rob,
>
> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>
I've put in a request to get that page updated.
> A couple of quick questions
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensen
> wrote:
>
>> Howdy Rob,
>>
>> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
>> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>>
>
> FYI on the e
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Drew Jensen wrote:
> Howdy Rob,
>
> Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
> "IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
>
FYI on the existing consultant entries
http://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consul
Andre Fischer wrote:
I would now like to change the build system, especially the
solenv/bin/make_installer.pl script and its modules, so that the
installation sets it creates can be used without further changes to
create patch sets. I would also like to add the patch creation itself.
This is an
On Oct 22, 2013, at 17:33 , Guenter Marxen
wrote:
>
> Am 22.10.2013 22:31, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
>>>
>> @ all (including me, who is lazier than most and even more shameless):
>> please bottom post. :-)
>>
>> louis
>
> Louis, thanks. But I wouldt like a little bit more.
Well, so woul
Am 22.10.2013 22:31, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
@ all (including me, who is lazier than most and even more shameless): please
bottom post. :-)
louis
Louis, thanks. But I wouldt like a little bit more.
I am very astonished, that on this list with very experienced users
nearly _nobody_ fo
Grisbi is also a good one:
http://www.grisbi.org/
Their site is under maintenance but the application works fine.
Hagar
Le 22/10/2013 00:28, Rob Weir a écrit :
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Afshin Karjoo wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if you would consider releasing an open source version
Herbert Dürr wrote:
[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=85356
[2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=63270
[3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
This is an interesting reality check and I'm afraid the project lost
users that depended on that functionalit
On 22 Oct 2013, at 16:20 , Drew Jensen wrote:
> wow, all good stuff guys.
>
> Turns out the website (show) already lists an ODF mobile reader:
> http://www.appbrain.com/app/openoffice-document-reader/at.tomtasche.reader
>
> Also, the request from the caller was not about reading ODF files, rat
wow, all good stuff guys.
Turns out the website (show) already lists an ODF mobile reader:
http://www.appbrain.com/app/openoffice-document-reader/at.tomtasche.reader
Also, the request from the caller was not about reading ODF files, rather
creating files using voice-to-text and was looking for so
Howdy Rob,
Ah trademarks - yes, I agree the Apache OpenOffice should have a TM, a la:
"IBM® Lotus® Symphony™ is a suite of open source office applications."
A couple of quick questions if I may.
Will the support only be available to those with the IBM connectors? IIRC
that was the plan in the pa
Hi.
On 22 October 2013 16:09, janI wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The database(s) behind forum.o.o need to be changed and moved to a new
> fast central sql server.
>
> In order to test the changes without disturbing anyone, I have created a
> forum "test" where all needed changes will be done during the co
On 2013-10-22, at 14:21 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-10-22, at 14:11 , Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
>>> wrote:
On 2013-10-22, at 13:38 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-22, at 14:11 , Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2013-10-22, at 13:38 , Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
wrote:
>
On 2013-10-22, at 14:11 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-10-22, at 13:38 , Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
>>> wrote:
On 2013-10-21, at 18:28 , Ian Lynch wrote:
> Gi
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-22, at 13:38 , Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2013-10-21, at 18:28 , Ian Lynch wrote:
>>>
Given the number of Android devices out there and growing I can se
On 10/22/2013 7:15 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
On 22.10.2013 14:22, Herbert Dürr wrote:
On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
[...]
Since issue 91209 the mozilla address books were disabled on Mac
altogether anyway, so on Mac we could rid AOO of its heavy
On 2013-10-22, at 13:38 , Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>>
>> On 2013-10-21, at 18:28 , Ian Lynch wrote:
>>
>>> Given the number of Android devices out there and growing I can see a time
>>> where if its not editable there it won't be worth cons
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-21, at 18:28 , Ian Lynch wrote:
>
>> Given the number of Android devices out there and growing I can see a time
>> where if its not editable there it won't be worth considering.
>
> That time is now.
The 800-lbs gorilla is
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:57:48PM -0700, Kay Schenk wrote:
> > Should we *try* to migrate to something else?
>
> The Help is available for extension developers [1], "something else"
> would mean an incompatible change, and an
Hello;
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
While on the subject of replacing mozilla addressbook, just thought I'd
remind about the analysis done by Andre while we were w
One consideration is power consumption, cost is another, multi-vendor is
another. We can also learn from history that volumes determine markets and
the Android/Arm combo is sweeping the planet. It's not in our power to stop
that any more than is would be to ignore Windows on desktops. If Intel
can'
On 22 October 2013 16:41, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22.10.2013 10:04, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's really daunting that nobody cares!
>>
>>
> I care, but only as a user of our Bugzilla instance being frustrated when
> I need Bugzilla in the morning (European time zo
Hi,
On 22.10.2013 10:04, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hi,
it's really daunting that nobody cares!
I care, but only as a user of our Bugzilla instance being frustrated
when I need Bugzilla in the morning (European time zone).
It seems that we need to involve ASF Infra as I do not believe that t
On 22 October 2013 16:15, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 14:22, Herbert Dürr wrote:
>
>> On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
>>>
[...]
Since issue 91209 the mozilla address books were disabled on Mac
altogether anyway, so on M
On 22.10.2013 14:22, Herbert Dürr wrote:
On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
[...]
Since issue 91209 the mozilla address books were disabled on Mac
altogether anyway, so on Mac we could rid AOO of its heavy Seamonkey
dependency really soon without rem
Hi.
The database(s) behind forum.o.o need to be changed and moved to a new fast
central sql server.
In order to test the changes without disturbing anyone, I have created a
forum "test" where all needed changes will be done during the coming days.
Thursday 22/10 at 1500 UTC, we will begin moving
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag
wrote:
> Another +1 here. I'm actually just reading the e-mails ever since I got
> here to see if I can get something from those.
>
> I checked https://issues.apache.org/ooo/query.cgi?format=report-table and
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/desc
Congratulations for YuZhen
Fan.
> On October 22, 2013 at 9:40
> AM Rob Weir
> wrote:
>
>
> The Project Management
> Committee (PMC) for Apache
> OpenOffice has asked
> YuZhen Fan to become a
> committer and we are pleased
> to announce
> that she has accepted and
> taken the ID "fanyuzhen".
>
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Vladislav Stevanovic
wrote:
>>It seems it's a bit hidden
>
> It is a bit hidden, indeed! And my impression of this page is distant,
> cold tone. No emotions, no pictures to show where is problem, there is no
> directly approach to the potential developers. Also,
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache OpenOffice has asked
YuZhen Fan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
that she has accepted and taken the ID "fanyuzhen".
A warm welcome to YuZhen !
Regards,
Rob, on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC
On 21 Oct 2013, at 17:27, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Tony Stevenson wrote:
>> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200:
>>> Please tell us when the migration is complete so that we can remove
>>> the warning.
>> The service is back. IMO it also quicker. Immediate difference i
On 22 October 2013 13:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 13:32, janI wrote:
>
>> On 22 October 2013 13:10, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hello everybody,
> At the moment we provide
On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
[...]
Since issue 91209 the mozilla address books were disabled on Mac
altogether anyway, so on Mac we could rid AOO of its heavy Seamonkey
dependency really soon without removing any features by using NSS instead
of
On 22.10.2013 13:40, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:31, Andre Fischer wrote:
I don't know much about language support of installer and patches but I
see a problem with spell checking. Spell checking and grammar checking is
done by extensions which have to be registered at first start. Tha
On 22.10.2013 13:32, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:10, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hello everybody,
At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
all platforms and languages. An ins
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr wrote:
> About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years
> wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient) version
> of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with its security
> features enabled such a
On 22 October 2013 13:31, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 13:08, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:20 AM, janI wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello everybody,
At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and
On 22 October 2013 13:10, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote:
>
>> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,
>>>
>>> At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
>>> all platforms and languages. An installation set ha
On 22.10.2013 13:08, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:20 AM, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hello everybody,
At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size of
About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years
wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient)
version of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with
its security features enabled such as support for password protected
documents.
The br
Thank you very much. I am happy to be with this huge family and thank you for
this offer and accept me.
Best Wishes
Burak Yavuz
> Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:06:14 +0200
> From: pesce...@apache.org
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> CC: bour...@apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Burak Yavuz (bour
On 22.10.2013 12:20, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hello everybody,
At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size of
roughly 150MB. The size of the actual changes is
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:20 AM, janI wrote:
> On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
>
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
>> all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size of
>> roughly 150MB. The siz
On 22 October 2013 12:47, imacat wrote:
> On 2013/10/22 16:10, imacat said:
> > On 2013/10/22 15:42, janI said:
> >> On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote:
> >>> On 2013/10/22 02:37, janI said:
> On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> > Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21,
On 2013/10/22 16:10, imacat said:
> On 2013/10/22 15:42, janI said:
>> On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote:
>>> On 2013/10/22 02:37, janI said:
On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200:
>> Tony Stevenson wrote
On 22 October 2013 11:48, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and for
> all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size of
> roughly 150MB. The size of the actual changes is typically much smaller.
>
Hello everybody,
At the moment we provide full installation sets for every release and
for all platforms and languages. An installation set has a typical size
of roughly 150MB. The size of the actual changes is typically much
smaller. Using patches instead of full installation sets would
c
Hi Phan.
We (infra) are going the move the forum database to a central server, in
order to that we need some preparation work done.
Currently the VI forum is the one with the lowest load (ref. imacat), so we
would like to test the changes on the VI forum, before changing all forums.
The changes
On 2013/10/22 15:42, janI said:
> On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote:
>> On 2013/10/22 02:37, janI said:
>>> On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200:
> Tony Stevenson wrote:
>> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oc
Hi,
it's really daunting that nobody cares!
CU
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On 22 October 2013 03:02, imacat wrote:
> 於 2013年10月22日 02:37, janI 提到:
> > On 21 October 2013 18:39, Tony Stevenson wrote:
> >
> >> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:27:50PM +0200:
> >>> Tony Stevenson wrote:
> Andrea Pescetti wrote on Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:52:14PM +0200:
53 matches
Mail list logo
