Re: Release communications -- plans

On 18/07/2013 Rob Weir wrote: The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth reviewing if you have not looked recently: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes Indeed, they are nice. The part introducing the Sidebar is very good too. Just a qu

RE: Fwd: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module "stlport"

HI Regina, Yes It's correct I am trying to build Version 3.4.1 which is the latest stable version. Thanks and Regards, Ankur Singhal -Original Message- From: Regina Henschel [mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de] Sent: 18 July 2013 22:07 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Singhal, Ankur Subject:

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

+1 (!) On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: > +1Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 > > > > On 7/17/2013 12:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package b

Re: Cwiki vs Media WIki again...

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, janI wrote: > On 18 July 2013 23:32, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > > > Am 07/18/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > > > In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site: > >> > >> http://www.wikimatrix.org/ > >> > >> No sure about accuracy. > >>

Re: Volunteering to create Pootle accounts

On 19 July 2013 01:11, janI wrote: > > > > On 19 July 2013 00:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> I expect an increased traffic of Pootle account requests (from >> non-committers) next week, when we will release version 4.0 and new >> volunteers will want to translate OpenOffice 4.0 into their mothe

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

+1Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 On 7/17/2013 12:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... -

Re: Volunteering to create Pootle accounts

On 19 July 2013 00:46, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > I expect an increased traffic of Pootle account requests (from > non-committers) next week, when we will release version 4.0 and new > volunteers will want to translate OpenOffice 4.0 into their mother tongue. > > Unless we are already covered for a

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On 18 July 2013 23:31, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, janI wrote: > > On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: > >> > >> > On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI w

Volunteering to create Pootle accounts

I expect an increased traffic of Pootle account requests (from non-committers) next week, when we will release version 4.0 and new volunteers will want to translate OpenOffice 4.0 into their mother tongue. Unless we are already covered for a timely creation of accounts, I volunteer to get admi

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

Hi, +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 Kind regards Regina Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger vi

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

+1 Marcus Am 07/17/2013 09:40 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is a key mileston

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7

The 3.3.0 Releases were all by Oracle on January 18, 2011. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 01:15 PM To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java

Re: Cwiki vs Media WIki again...

On 18 July 2013 23:32, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > Am 07/18/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > > In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site: >> >> http://www.wikimatrix.org/ >> >> No sure about accuracy. >> > > Great link, thanks! > > Now both can be compared with facts -

Re: Cwiki vs Media WIki again...

Am 07/18/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site: http://www.wikimatrix.org/ No sure about accuracy. Great link, thanks! Now both can be compared with facts - assumed they are correct. ;-) Marcus -

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, janI wrote: > On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: >> >> > On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: >> >>> On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>>

Cwiki vs Media WIki again...

In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site: http://www.wikimatrix.org/ No sure about accuracy. -- - MzK Success is falling nine times and getting up ten."

Re: Mac release

Am 07/18/2013 05:23 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer: On 17.07.2013 22:50, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/15/2013 07:06 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/15/2013 06:57 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer: On 15.07.2013 18:08, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/15/2013 10:

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

Am 07/18/2013 08:41 PM, schrieb janI: On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: We have the opportunity to restructure

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7

Thanks and yes, no help! -Original Message- From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:28 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Steele, Raymond Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7 Am 07/18/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond: > Tha

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7

Am 07/18/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond: Thanks for responding. Do you know who built the Solaris Intel distributions posted on this page? http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/other.html I am not adverse to rebuilding the code for Solaris 10 x86, but in the meantime, I am looking

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7

Thanks for responding. Do you know who built the Solaris Intel distributions posted on this page? http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/other.html I am not adverse to rebuilding the code for Solaris 10 x86, but in the meantime, I am looking for a quicker solution to my problem. -Origin

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7

No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There was an out-of-cycle security fix, but that did not require rebuilding the application. I don't believe that fix was provided for Solaris, however.) The Apache OpenOffice code base was based on OpenOffice.org code tha

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7

Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seems that we could easily add the new vendor to the few files listed here, then recompile. I am sure someone already has the environment set up considering the code was compiled for Solaris x86 in the past. This could then become a version

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate > (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an > important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. > It is a key mile

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > > > > On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: > > > >> On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: > On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: > >>> On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> > We have the opportunity to restructure

Re: Openoffice Base copy function

On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John 73 WA4GPS <73wa4...@sc.rr.com> wrote: > In my club membership data base, I can use "Filter by Selection" to > isolate a group of members that I want to send an E-mail to and, if I click > on the "E-mail Address" field label, the entire column is highlighted bu

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: > > > On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: > >>> On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: > >>> > We have the opportunity to restructure the pages

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: > >> On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: > We have the opportunity to restructure the pag

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote: > On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: >>> On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: >>> We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When looking over the current struct

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

janI wrote: +1 rgds jan I On 17 July 2013 09:40, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. It is

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: > > On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: > > > >> We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When > >> looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two > >> enti

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When > looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two > entirely different approaches to organizing the information: > > 1) A team-oriented approach, where

Re: Fwd: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module "stlport"

Hi Ankur, is it correct, that you want to build the version 3.4.1? Kind regards Regina Rob Weir schrieb: Forwarding to our development mailing list where you are more likely to get an answer. -Rob -- Forwarded message -- From: Singhal, Ankur Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:24

Re: Release communications -- plans

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth > > reviewing if you have not looked recently: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Not

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013/7/18 imacat > On 2013/07/18 19:09, Jürgen Schmidt said: > > On 7/18/13 1:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote: > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could > >>> it be added to the release now? ^_^ > >> > >> no,

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

On 2013/07/18 19:09, Jürgen Schmidt said: > On 7/18/13 1:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could >>> it be added to the release now? ^_^ >> >> no, it is too late and I won't do a res

Re: Mac release

On 17.07.2013 22:50, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/15/2013 07:06 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/15/2013 06:57 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer: On 15.07.2013 18:08, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer: Issue 122732 [1]r

Re: Release communications -- plans

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth > reviewing if you have not looked recently: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes > > This is the primary statement of what is in the release.

It is time to update your entry in the Directory of Volunteers

Make sure you are included in our Directory of Volunteers and that the information is as you want it to appear: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Directory+of+Volunteers This page is linked to (indirectly) from the "credits" link of the Help/About dialog box in AOO 4.0. It wil

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove WikiAdmin email form

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:31 AM, janI wrote: > Contact page is removed. > > Can we please find a way to qualify BZ requests in the future, so we can > avoid triple work (add contact page, move contact page, remove contact > page). > > Qualifying request in BZ should make it obvious if its a wish,

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI wrote: > On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: > >> We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When >> looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two >> entirely different approaches to organizing the informati

Re: Fwd: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module "stlport"

On 18.07.2013 16:26, Rob Weir wrote: Forwarding to our development mailing list where you are more likely to get an answer. -Rob -- Forwarded message -- From: Singhal, Ankur Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:24 AM Subject: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module "stlport" To:

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013/7/17 Jürgen Schmidt > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate > (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an > important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. > It is a key milestone to continue the success

Re: Structure of the CWiki?

On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir wrote: > We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When > looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two > entirely different approaches to organizing the information: > > 1) A team-oriented approach, where at the top

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove WikiAdmin email form

Contact page is removed. Can we please find a way to qualify BZ requests in the future, so we can avoid triple work (add contact page, move contact page, remove contact page). Qualifying request in BZ should make it obvious if its a wish, or something the community have agreed upon. rgds jan I.

Fwd: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module "stlport"

Forwarding to our development mailing list where you are more likely to get an answer. -Rob -- Forwarded message -- From: Singhal, Ankur Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:24 AM Subject: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module "stlport" To: "us...@openoffice.apache.org" Hi Tea

Release communications -- plans

The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth reviewing if you have not looked recently: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes This is the primary statement of what is in the release. The introductory sections are general enough that this pag

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate > (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an > important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. > It is a key miles

Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove WikiAdmin email form

>Alternatively, maybe there is a way to add a CAPTCHA to the form, >preferable one that is impossible to solve ;-) Seems to be possible like this example: http://brightbyte.de/mw/index.php?title=Special:Contact - To unsubscribe, e

Re: User Guides

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > Hi, all, > I just noticed that the latest user guides we have is for OpenOffice.org > 3.3, as below: > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOo3_User_Guides > > I wonder if any one is willing to help to update the user guides fo

Structure of the CWiki?

We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two entirely different approaches to organizing the information: 1) A team-oriented approach, where at the top organizational level there are parent pages for e

[PROPOSAL] Remove WikiAdmin email form

Today I woke up to find approximately 15 spam messages to the dev list, all from the WikiAdmin form. It looks like spammers have found it. The signal/noise ratio for this was never good to start with -- maybe 10 misdirected support questions for every legitimate wiki admin question. But now with

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

On 7/18/13 1:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could >> it be added to the release now? ^_^ > > no, it is too late and I won't do a respin. But I will integrate the > translation on tru

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote: > Dear all, > > The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could > it be added to the release now? ^_^ no, it is too late and I won't do a respin. But I will integrate the translation on trunk immediately and we can build an unofficial snapsho

User Guides

Hi, all, I just noticed that the latest user guides we have is for OpenOffice.org 3.3, as below: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOo3_User_Guides I wonder if any one is willing to help to update the user guides for AOO 4.0? Thanks! - Shenfeng (Simon)

4.0.0_release_blocker denied: [Bug 122780] Clicking Insert in dialog Insert Section incorrectly activated by Edit -> paste, causes application hung

j...@apache.org has denied fanyuz...@gmail.com's request for 4.0.0_release_blocker: Bug 122780: Clicking Insert in dialog Insert Section incorrectly activated by Edit -> paste, causes application hung https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122780 --- Additional Comments from j...@apach

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

On 7/18/13 12:01 PM, imacat wrote: > -1 for Traditional Chinese version not included yet. > Traditional Chinese is not part of the vote, means your vote is unqualified and not valid. The reason why it is not included is also known, sorry but this makes no sense. Juergen > On 2013/07/18 16:54,

Possible show stopper on Mac in RC2, please confirm

When open Writer on Mac, menu Edit -> Paste is enabled incorrectly as default, click Paste, you will get an unexpected "Insert Section" dialog, after click "Insert" in this dialog, the application is hung. I saw this issue several times in RC1 on Windows (but not in RC1 with patch and RC2 on Wind

Re: [RELEASE]: building a new RC on revision 1503704

I have downloaded Mac and Windows builds, they are all successfully installed. I play on them for a while, no new problems found but a hung/crash happens again in RC2 revision 1503704 (it has been reproduced but not always on RC1 revision 1502185). I document this issue in Bugzilla for our awarene

4.0.0_release_blocker requested: [Bug 122780] Clicking Insert in dialog Insert Section incorrectly activated by Edit -> paste, cause application hung

fanyuz...@gmail.com has asked for 4.0.0_release_blocker: Bug 122780: Clicking Insert in dialog Insert Section incorrectly activated by Edit -> paste, cause application hung https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122780 --- Additional Comments from fanyuz...@gmail.com Steps: 1. Open Wr

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

-1 for Traditional Chinese version not included yet. On 2013/07/18 16:54, Rory O'Farrell said: > > +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 > > -- Best regards, imacat ^_*' PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc <> News: http://www.wov.idv.tw/ Tavern IMACAT's http://www.ima

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

Dear all, The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could it be added to the release now? ^_^ https://translate.apache.org/zh_TW/aoo40/ On 2013/07/18 02:57, Juergen Schmidt said: > Am Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2013 um 20:31 schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Jü

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0 -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [VOTE]: Release OpenOffice 4.0 (RC2)

2013/7/17 Jürgen Schmidt > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate > (RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an > important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes. > It is a key milestone to continue the success

Re: Cwiki: use pictures attached on a different page

2013/7/18 Keith N. McKenna > Keith N. McKenna wrote: > >> Ricardo Berlasso wrote: >> >>> I started a translation for the release notes as a child page of the >>> release notes itself >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/pages/viewpage.** >>> action?pageId=33295326

Re: Cwiki: use pictures attached on a different page

Keith N. McKenna wrote: Ricardo Berlasso wrote: I started a translation for the release notes as a child page of the release notes itself https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33295326 But pictures attached to the main release notes page are not displayed on the chil

Re: Cwiki: use pictures attached on a different page

Ricardo Berlasso wrote: I started a translation for the release notes as a child page of the release notes itself https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33295326 But pictures attached to the main release notes page are not displayed on the child page. Is there any easy