Integrating port specific syscall proxies

2024-05-26 Thread Stuart Ianna
be nice if this was more generally supported, rather than patching the kernel locally. I'd be interested to know if anyone has had a similar idea, or potentially there is a method to achieve this in Nuttx which I have overlooked. -- *Kind regards,* *Stuart Ianna* *Firmware Engineer* -- *MoTe

Re: Integrating port specific syscall proxies

2024-05-26 Thread Stuart Ianna
into these and see if this approach meets your need. > > > -- *Kind regards,* *Stuart Ianna* *Firmware Engineer* -- *MoTeC Pty Ltd* 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136 Victoria Australia *T: *61 3 9761 5050 *W: *www.motec.com.au <https://www.motec.com.au/> -- <htt

Re: Integrating port specific syscall proxies

2024-05-30 Thread Stuart Ianna
om any hostile code. > > The fix is relatively simple (if the description of the issue is > correct). In all places where kernel-only accessible memory is mapped by > the MMU, the protection bits must be set so that user space access is > prohibited. This might have side effects on a

Re: Help us to create a distributed board testing farm

2024-07-18 Thread Stuart Ianna
t; Ken > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/18/24 12:14 PM, Alan C. Assis wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are creating a testing farm for NuttX to be integrated on > our > > > CI. > >