STM32F479NGH6 + Ethernet

2025-06-08 Thread Simon Filgis
Dear all, I want to add ethernet to a new project based on STM32F479NGH6. Has somebody worked with this configuration? Any tips or recommendations in choosing a MAC phy? I would like to have a proof of concept (switch to nuttx) with very little effort. Best regards, Simon -- Hard- and Softwar

Re: STM32F479NGH6 + Ethernet

2025-06-08 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Simon, I used DP83848C about 10 years ago and it was really easy to use on NuttX ("just works"). Then about 3 years ago I used LAN8740AI with STM32H743 and it also worked, but it required some tweaks to configure the right PHY registers. BTW, you are not limited only to those two options we ci

Re: STM32F479NGH6 + Ethernet

2025-06-08 Thread Simon Filgis
Seems like 1. DP83848C There is some code for it in stm32_x.c and it is placed on an old evaluation board of STM: STM32469I-EVAL And another board, that is already in nuttx boards: https://www.viewtool.com/index.php/en/36-2016-09-26-03-58-56/99-ficus-stm32f107 Not sure where t

Re: SYSLOG over the network

2025-06-08 Thread Matteo Golin
Hello everyone, Here's an initial implementation! There are two PRs: 1) RFC 5424 support in the syslog kernel driver: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16493 2) syslogd application for transmitting RFC 5424 compatible messages over the network: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/3090 I

Re: STM32F479NGH6 + Ethernet

2025-06-08 Thread N M
KSZ90x1 is a gigabit PHY. I see mention of support for it here https://github.com/apache/nuttx/blob/dd07367f4eeb5ebe785c601e84143cfaf6ad411a/include/nuttx/net/gmii.h#L65 I haven’t used this PHY for any NuttX projects though. I worked on a project a few years ago and we wanted to be up and runni