Hello Alan and other,
the time is passing by so fast.
I have interest in more NuttX related topics
- CAN/CAN FD NuttX API enhancements and deduplication, at start at least
bittiming
https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15567
- PWM API cleanup, only one API compatible with actual
mu
Thank you for responding!
That is a great suggestion and i will be looking into it.
However, I have a concern about receiving a PWM interface. For PWM audio to
work, the PWM interface must give a hardware address to its compare
register.
I haven't seen that the PWM interface is providing one.
This
Hello Alan and other,
the time is passing by so fast.
[resend, the my previous sender identity seems
not to propagate to the list]
I have interest in more NuttX related topics
- CAN/CAN FD NuttX API enhancements and deduplication, at start at least
bittiming
https://github.com/apache/nut
Thank you Pavel! :-)
Here is the Apache's GSoC 2025 page with all information needed + timeline:
https://community.apache.org/gsoc/
Please let us know in case you need any support :-)
Tomek
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:35 PM Pavel Pisa wrote:
>
> Hello Alan and other,
>
> the time is passing by
Kevin, try creating upper-half driver (i.e. pwmaudio providing OSS
like /dev/dsp with ioctl interface to set sample format and sampling
frequency) that would be common for all platforms and lower-half
implementation that would leverage platform specific hardware features
that you need. When success
Voted!
Please vote. This is valid for the overall NuttX community (not only PMCs
or committers).
Em sex., 21 de fev. de 2025 às 23:45, Tomek CEDRO
escreveu:
> Hello world :-)
>
> After the first voting, discussions, and updates, here goes the Round
> 2 of the voting for NuttX Contributing Guide
Hi Tomek,
thanks for taking the leas on the new vote round but
I would like to express my concern because AFAIK the voting process should be
conducted on the mailing list for transparency and archiving purposes.
I think that it is better to restart the vote on the mailing list (similar to
round
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:45 AM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Hello world :-)
> After the first voting, discussions, and updates, here goes the Round
> 2 of the voting for NuttX Contributing Guidelines update:
> https://forms.gle/m3uRDGuE3QZy2yNn6
> There are again all rule propositions numbered from 1 to
My responses below :-)
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> 1. Contributing Guidelines with hints for Reviewers.
> We are adding additional section for Reviewers to Contributing
> Guidelines in order to provide checklist and complementary set of
> rules that should filter out brea
Hi,
> 1. Contributing Guidelines with hints for Reviewers.
> We are adding additional section for Reviewers to Contributing
> Guidelines in order to provide checklist and complementary set of
> rules that should filter out breaking code as much as possible also on
> our side.
+1
> 2. PR and GIT
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> My responses below :-)
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> > 1. Contributing Guidelines with hints for Reviewers.
> > We are adding additional section for Reviewers to Contributing
> > Guidelines in order to provide checkl
Hi Alin,
It seems you mixed my answers and Tomek's together. Can you double-check,
please?
Some answers weren't answered by you (8, for instance).
Best regards,
Em seg., 24 de fev. de 2025 às 11:12, Alin Jerpelea
escreveu:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:26 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
>
> > My respons
I think we should each reply to the original vote email. If we reply
to someone else's vote, the votes will get all mixed up like that.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 9:26 AM Tiago Medicci Serrano
wrote:
>
> Hi Alin,
>
> It seems you mixed my answers and Tomek's together. Can you double-check,
> please?
I am sorry for the confusion
Please fill in your answers to this email followed by the voter's name to
avoid future confusion
1. Contributing Guidelines with hints for Reviewers.
We are adding additional section for Reviewers to Contributing
Guidelines in order to provide checklist and complement
Tomek,
Single you are driving this discussion, could you please take care of the
management of the NuttX GSoC 2025?
There is another suggest that could participate this year:
https://github.com/ghaerr/microwindows/issues/85
BR,
Alan
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:00 PM Lee, Lup Yuen wrote:
> Sor
Thanks Alan, but we have no Mentors this year :-(
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:25 PM Alan C. Assis wrote:
>
> Tomek,
>
> Single you are driving this discussion, could you please take care of the
> management of the NuttX GSoC 2025?
>
> There is another suggest that could participate this year:
> htt
You can say the same about students: we don't have any students this year!
:-)
You need to find them. ;-)
Maybe Mr. Pisa could help you find mentors for GSoC 2025.
BR,
Alan
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> Thanks Alan, but we have no Mentors this year :-(
>
> On Mon, Feb
Hi!
Tiago, since you are the audio guy, what do you think? Is it possible to
> create the "fake" audio codec that works with PWM and DMA the way I'm
> suggesting?
Yes, the audio subsystem is created in layers. It wouldn't be a codec by
itself (like PCM), but still can be understood as an *audio
18 matches
Mail list logo
