On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 8:35 AM Tiago Medicci Serrano <
tiago.medi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Python was recently ported to NuttX. I wrote about the technical details
> of this work in the following article.
>
>
This is great news! I was always interested in NuttX but now it can solve
some real probl
Kudos Tiago!
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, 21:06 Tiago Medicci Serrano,
wrote:
> Thanks Tomek and Victor
>
> Thank you and Congratulations Tiago!!! Having full Python is better
> > than MicroPython.. do you have a comparison on the resources use
> > between those two? :-)
>
>
> We still don't have anythi
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 12:35 PM Tiago Medicci Serrano
wrote:
> Hi,
> Python was recently ported to NuttX. I wrote about the technical details of
> this work in the following article.
> Check it at
> https://tmedicci.github.io/articles/2025/01/08/python_on_nuttx.html
> (comments and suggestions a
Thanks Tomek and Victor
Thank you and Congratulations Tiago!!! Having full Python is better
> than MicroPython.. do you have a comparison on the resources use
> between those two? :-)
We still don't have anything about it. It's something that may be
interesting to compare.
Em qua., 8 de jan. de
Tiago,
Thank you and Congratulations!
Regarding the following paragraph:
> One can argue that Python wasn’t designed to run on resource-constrained
devices - like the ones that are supported by the NuttX RTOS - and that there
are other alternatives for developing embedded applications.
I just
Hi,
Before creating an issue I want to be sure some points about I2C upper layer
driver. I did not get the implementation exactly.
My question about upper layer functions
is("nuttx/drivers/i2c/i2c_slave_driver.c"):
- Read operation (i2c_slave_read/i2c_slave_driver.c:291) is expecting
"priv->re
Hi,
Python was recently ported to NuttX. I wrote about the technical details of
this work in the following article.
Check it at
https://tmedicci.github.io/articles/2025/01/08/python_on_nuttx.html
(comments and suggestions are highly encouraged!)
[image: nuttx_python.png]