[POSIX][Bug] mqueue.h: Include file does not conform the standard (#15085)

2024-12-09 Thread Javier Alonso
Good morning NuttX devs, This is Javi. I'm writing you regarding a compliant bug regarding the mqueue header and POSIX. The IEEE Std 1003.1-2024 states that some symbols should be exposed when doing #include but are missing in the " include/mqueue.h" NuttX version, failing to comply with the stan

Re: NSH Not Responding to Commands Over Serial on STM32F446RET

2024-12-09 Thread Russell Burgett
thanks Alan, I inherited the project from another developer and have been using his settings - will start turning things off right after I posted I built the Nuttx example for this board so I am going to use this as basis for my project russ On Fri, Dec 6, 2024 at 2:54 PM Alan C. Assis wrote: >

Re: NSH Not Responding to Commands Over Serial on STM32F446RET

2024-12-09 Thread Russell Burgett
The nuttx example ran with no issues On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 7:26 AM Russell Burgett wrote: > thanks Alan, > I inherited the project from another developer and have been using his > settings - will start turning things off > right after I posted I built the Nuttx example for this board so I am >

cmake support for espressif devices

2024-12-09 Thread Laczen JMS
Hi, I was trying to use out of tree builds using cmake for a esp32c3. It seems that cmake is not supported on this device (and from a quick search, none of the espressif boards). Is this a WIP or are there no plans to add cmake support for these devices? I would like to help if needed, but I wou

Re: [POSIX][Bug] mqueue.h: Include file does not conform the standard (#15085)

2024-12-09 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 5:57 AM Javier Alonso wrote: > Good morning NuttX devs, > > This is Javi. I'm writing you regarding a compliant bug regarding the > mqueue header and POSIX. The IEEE Std 1003.1-2024 states that some > symbols should be exposed when doing #include but are missing > in the "

Re: NSH Not Responding to Commands Over Serial on STM32F446RET

2024-12-09 Thread Alan C. Assis
Hi Russell, Thanks for confirming. In this case, you can try to start with the original nsh example that works and then start adding new features from the bad configuration, until you find the guilt. Another approach is using GDB to debug and see where it is blocking. This approach could be fast

SERIOUS BUG: Zero Latency Interrupts are broken!

2024-12-09 Thread Nathan Hartman
Hi all, Unfortunately I missed the PR before it was merged, but PR-15073 has broken High Priority, Zero Latency Interrupts! Fortunately I caught it now. It was merged 17 hours ago. This PR removed a very important Kconfig: config ARMV7M_USEBASEPRI, and much of the logic related to it. This config

Re: NSH Not Responding to Commands Over Serial on STM32F446RET

2024-12-09 Thread Russell Haley
For what it's worth: I had issues using ST-Link and serial with a Nucleo board for that MCU. I luckily had two boards and found that one worked and one didn't. From the list archive: I say was, because I eventually did gain access. It turns out that I have two different kinds of nucleo boards but

Re: SERIOUS BUG: Zero Latency Interrupts are broken!

2024-12-09 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:46 PM Xiang Xiao wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:53 AM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Unfortunately I missed the PR before it was merged, but PR-15073 has > > broken High Priority, Zero Latency Interrupts! Fortunately I caught it > > now. It was merged

Re: SERIOUS BUG: Zero Latency Interrupts are broken!

2024-12-09 Thread Gregory Nutt
On 12/9/2024 3:52 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote: Hi all, Unfortunately I missed the PR before it was merged, but PR-15073 has broken High Priority, Zero Latency Interrupts! Fortunately I caught it now. It was merged 17 hours ago. This PR removed a very important Kconfig: config ARMV7M_USEBASEPRI,

Re: SERIOUS BUG: Zero Latency Interrupts are broken!

2024-12-09 Thread Xiang Xiao
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 5:53 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > Hi all, > > Unfortunately I missed the PR before it was merged, but PR-15073 has > broken High Priority, Zero Latency Interrupts! Fortunately I caught it > now. It was merged 17 hours ago. > > Zero Latency Interrupts doesn't remove from PR-1

Re: SERIOUS BUG: Zero Latency Interrupts are broken!

2024-12-09 Thread Tomek CEDRO
Whoops, good catch Nathan! +1 to revert all breaking commits and thing for a better solution :-) I can see you already reported here: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/15100 Tomek On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 10:53 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > Hi all, > > Unfortunately I missed the PR before i