OMK Makefile.rules for NuttX and template application

Hello Roberto and others, Short: we have template NuttX project which is prepared to build broad range of projects against exported NuttX build (remark not tested on Windows yet) https://github.com/ppisa/nuttx-devel The complete build including NuttX build and export for imxRT Teensy based pro

Hardcoded Pin mux, pad control and Drive Strength (AKA Slew-rate and Frequency) Settings #1570

Opening the discussion for this issue on the list. See https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/1570 I would like to get feedback on the approach see if we can move forward on this. While some solutions were discussed in - Revert "stm32h7 sdmmc: set SDMMC_CK pin to high speed (50 MHz) mod

Re: Hardcoded Pin mux, pad control and Drive Strength (AKA Slew-rate and Frequency) Settings #1570

Thanks for the notification. Your proposal is mostly OK for me, I hope others will send reactions too. I have just one concern. If I attempt to rephrase the proposal: Starting from a commit in a future, stm32h7 GPIO definitions will not include speed indications anymore, and these will have

[~Possibly~ Breaking Change] Make FIFO POSIX-compliant (block when opening for write-only);

Hi NuttXers! I've just submitted a proposal for making NuttX's pipe (FIFO) POSIX-compliant regarding `open` for write-only when there are no readers. Nowadays, opening a FIFO for write-only (with O_NONBLOCK cleared) won't block even if there are no readers. Only opening for read-only (with no wri

running GCC

Hi everyone! Considering that NuttX is POSIX compliant, can gcc or clang be run on NuttX?