Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]

2022-04-14 Thread Duo Zhang
This is all the directories in the LICENSE file, and after removing the files under these directories, I finally get a list with 136 files. We are very close to finish the license work now :) 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于2022年4月14日周四 20:51写道: > Oh I must have made some mistakes in the scripts... > > See the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]

2022-04-14 Thread Duo Zhang
Oh I forgot to paste the directory list... fs/nfs fs/spiffs libs/libc/math libs/libc/lzf include/lzf drivers/video/ov2640 libs/libc/machine/arm/armv8-m libs/libc/wchar libs/libc/wctype wireless/bluetooth tools/size_report drivers/wireless/spirit/ arch/arm/src/nrf52/sdk-nrfxlib 张铎(Duo Zhang) 于202

Re: [LEGAL] Update of include/nuttx/wireless/ieee80211/ieee80211.h

2022-04-14 Thread Petro Karashchenko
The PR contains the implementation of inline functions. Are those handled in the same way as symbols definitions? Best regards, Petro ср, 13 квіт. 2022 р. о 16:10 Alan Carvalho de Assis пише: > Simple header files, for example only symbols definitions are not > considered derivative work, more

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 10.3.0 [RC0]

2022-04-14 Thread Duo Zhang
Ah, then let me just post them as the content. I've removed several files from the list by the information you provided. And I suggested that when you specify a library, better also provide the place where the related files are stored. For example, The Rhombus math library, I do not know which file

Re: [LEGAL] Update of include/nuttx/wireless/ieee80211/ieee80211.h

2022-04-14 Thread Gregory Nutt
Good question.  From what I read, inline functions ARE copyright-able, but of course, that is also controversial: https://lwn.net/Articles/53964/ Stallman's FSF statement implies that it depends on the /amount /of GPL code in the inline functions: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/03/20/15