Hello,
Today my application uses SmartFS associated with MX25L SPI Dataflash.
I intend to replace the SmartFS to LittleFS.
In the filesystem section of menuconfig, I can disable
CONFIG_FS_SMARTFS and enable CONFIG_FS_SMARTFS.
But when I go to "Device Drivers" --> "Memory Technology Device (MTD)
LittleFS can talk directly with the standard MTD driver, so you just need:
1. Call register_mtddriver in your board file
2. Run mount from nsh like this:
mount -t littlefs -o autoformat /dev/mtd /mnt
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:03 PM Flavio Castro Alves Filho <
flavio.al...@gmail
Hi folks,
I believe we should consider backporting the fix from this PR into the
10.1.0 release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3614
It fixes a side effect from the refactoring of the stack architecture
due to a wrong stack alignment for RISC-V chips.
Best regards,
Gustavo.
On M
I will look into it ASAP
Regards
Alin
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 14:58 Gustavo Henrique Nihei
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I believe we should consider backporting the fix from this PR into the
> 10.1.0 release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3614
>
> It fixes a side effect from the refac
Yes! I just lit the label (backport/10.1)
-Original Message-
From: Gustavo Henrique Nihei [mailto:ghni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 5:58 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 10.1.0 (incubating) RC0 release
Hi folks,
I believe we should consider ba
Wasn't the stack restructure behind the 10.1 release?
Best,
Matias
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 09:57, Gustavo Henrique Nihei wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I believe we should consider backporting the fix from this PR into the
> 10.1.0 release:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3614
>
> It
> Wasn't the stack restructure behind the 10.1 release?
Yes, but that change just exposed an old issue.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 2:45 PM Matias N. wrote:
>
> Wasn't the stack restructure behind the 10.1 release?
>
> Best,
> Matias
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 09:57, Gustavo Henrique Nihei wrote:
Right, thanks.
I mentioned that this should be backported, not sure if the author saw it:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3613
Best,
Matias
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 10:46, Abdelatif Guettouche wrote:
> > Wasn't the stack restructure behind the 10.1 release?
>
> Yes, but that chan
> I mentioned that this should be backported, not sure if the author saw it:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3613
I've labeled it so. Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 2:51 PM Matias N. wrote:
>
> Right, thanks.
>
> I mentioned that this should be backported, not sure if the author
I am sorting out flexcom support for the SAMA5D2 as there are issues with the
arch files as well as Kconfig. In doing so, I would like to do it “right”.
If flexcoms are assigned as USARTs is the correct philosophy to register them
sequentially or as per flexcom port number? For example, if (o
I am sorting out flexcom support for the SAMA5D2 as there are issues with the
arch files as well as Kconfig. In doing so, I would like to do it “right”.
If flexcoms are assigned as USARTs is the correct philosophy to register them
sequentially or as per flexcom port number? For example,
Hello Xiang,
Thank you for your quick response.
How do I manage the format of a littlefs 'disk' from programming (not
nutshell) ?
I am looking for something similar to 'mksmatfs' function.
Or only the flash_eraseall function is enough? Or should I add the "-o
autoformat" option on the last para
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 8:12 AM Flavio Castro Alves Filho <
flavio.al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Xiang,
>
> Thank you for your quick response.
>
> How do I manage the format of a littlefs 'disk' from programming (not
> nutshell) ?
>
>
If you want to generate the initial littlefs image in host en
13 matches
Mail list logo
