Just as an intermediate result:
MSYS2
make distclean
tools/configure.sh stm32f4discovery/nsh
time make
current master
real35m54,957s
user2m29,879s
sys 6m31,525s
releases/9.0
real4m39,324s
user0m28,553s
sys 1m23,113s
The build is much slower than it used to be.
Does someo
If I have done everything right with usage of git bisect, the below commit
increased build time by factor 7 for MSYS2.
Since this is a rather huge commit, I think I can't be helpful figuring out the
actual reason.
And I'm not sure if this is perhaps even considered acceptable.
Regards, Johannes
Hi Johannes,
Did you try to reverse this commit to see if the problem goes away?
BR,
Alan
On 5/27/20, Schock, Johannes - NIVUS GmbH wrote:
> If I have done everything right with usage of git bisect, the below commit
> increased build time by factor 7 for MSYS2.
> Since this is a rather huge co
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
diff --git a/boards/arm/stm32/stm32f4discovery/configs/cxxtest/Make.defs
b/boards/arm/stm32/stm32f4discovery/configs/cxxtest/Make.defs
index 35cdb5ab6a..f60d2d9e31 100644
--- a/boards/arm/stm32/stm32f4discover
The new logo could be viewed online here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/New+Apache+Nuttx+Logo
Please give your feedback and suggestoion.
Are there any updates on the proposed new NuttX logos? We stopped
discussing this with no follow through plan.
I suppose that with n
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> > The new logo could be viewed online here:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/New+Apache+Nuttx+Logo
> > Please give your feedback and suggestoion.
>
> Are there any updates on the proposed new NuttX logos? We stopped
> dis
I want to ask a question based on the draft proposals. Are we allowed to
think broader? :) For instance, I wonder what the community would think
about using a mascot.
Erdem
Gregory Nutt , 27 May 2020 Çar, 16:45 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
>
> > The new logo could be viewed online here:
> > https://cwi
On 5/27/2020 8:53 AM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
The new logo could be viewed online here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/New+Apache+Nuttx+Logo
Please give your feedback and suggestoion.
Are there any updates on the proposed ne
I want to ask a question based on the draft proposals. Are we allowed to
think broader? :) For instance, I wonder what the community would think
about using a mascot.
I am open to that idea myself.. like Linux' penguin? Such a mascot
would need to have wide appeal and acceptance, I think a
In my opinion there should be a poll (on the same page) so that people can
vote the one that they like
Thanks
Alin
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:47 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Good point David!
>
> I got all logos from PDF and put it publicly visible:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> A contest is fine, maybe we could even create a pool to purchase a
> prize... like a nice, high end NuttX board? I would contribute.
That would provide more incentive to participate.
Let's find out if we can do this. Mentors? Is it allowed?
I tried to summarize the discussion of PR 1099 in a Wiki page. The PR
comments got messy and unreadable, here is a cleaned up version:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Kernel+Threads+with+Custom+Stacks
A contest is fine, maybe we could even create a pool to purchase a
prize... like a nice, high end NuttX board? I would contribute.
That would provide more incentive to participate.
Let's find out if we can do this. Mentors? Is it allowed? Is there a
process we have to follow?
I wonder if
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would that
cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
I saw a 7 minute build time on Cygwin. That is also very high, but not
at all the kind of
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would that
cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
I saw a 7 minute build time on Cygwin. That is also very high, but
not at all the kind of
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would
that cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
I saw a 7 minute build time on Cygwin. That is also very high, but
not at all the kind o
Well, it could be a gift certificate of some kind. Seems like it must
be embedded RTOS themed in some way, however.
Or maybe a trophy?
Better... a T-shirt or hoody with the selected logo on it.
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:15 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > Well, it could be a gift certificate of some kind. Seems like it must
> > be embedded RTOS themed in some way, however.
> >
> > Or maybe a trophy?
>
> Better... a T-shirt or hoody with the selected logo on it.
That's a neat idea!
Natha
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:39 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> >> it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
> >> invoking shell script:
> >
> > But wouldn't that affect all platforms proportionally? Why would that
> > cause such a huge increase on MSYS2.
> >
> > I saw a 7 minut
Okay, so only MSYS2 is seeing a dramatic change. That is a mystery.
On 5/27/2020 6:06 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:39 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
it seems because ARCHINCLUDES try to figure out the search path by
invoking shell script:
But wouldn't that affect all platforms
Before it's too late, I'd like to pose the question:
Is there no-one who prefers NuttX be spelled with lower-case "utt"?
Respectfully,
-david
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:15 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> >
> > > Well, it could be a gift certifi
21 matches
Mail list logo
