Re: "No Podling Name Search on file"

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:54 AM Brennan Ashton wrote: > I created the ticket > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-182 following the > same template as another pre-existing project that recently was approved. > > While I do not have access to the email thread that Greg refere

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

Update: It builds! It links! After much work, it's time to begin testing... https://github.com/hartmannathan/incubator-nuttx/tree/stm32g474 If all goes well, there will be a big pull request coming soon. Wish me luck! Nathan

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

I with you good luck! Welcome STM32G4! On 5/13/20, Nathan Hartman wrote: > Update: It builds! It links! After much work, it's time to begin testing... > > https://github.com/hartmannathan/incubator-nuttx/tree/stm32g474 > > If all goes well, there will be a big pull request coming soon. Wish me >

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

If all goes well, there will be a big pull request coming soon. Wish me luck! I think we should consider getting a review team together.  This will be more than a single person can review (especially if that single person is me since I am completely out of touch with with STM32 these days).

what to do with this?

I'm fixing styling errors on my PR and the first line of the license header triggers a long line error: * Copyright (C) 2018 Erle Robotics (Juan Flores Muñoz). All rights reserved. * Author: Erle Robotics (Juan Flores Muñoz)

Re: what to do with this?

I'm fixing styling errors on my PR and the first line of the license header triggers a long line error: * Copyright (C) 2018 Erle Robotics (Juan Flores Muñoz). All rights reserved. * Author: Erle Robotics (Juan Flores Muñoz) I usually do something like: * Copyright (C) 2018 Erle Robotics (

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:26 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > If all goes well, there will be a big pull request coming soon. Wish me > luck! > > I think we should consider getting a review team together. This will be > more than a single person can review (especially if that single person > is me

RE: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

Hi I would be happy to review this, but I will need some time as I am swapped. David -Original Message- From: Gregory Nutt [mailto:spudan...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:27 AM To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6 > If all goes well, there

Meadow.OS .NET Standard 2.0 on STM32F7 (NUTTX + Mono Framework)

Very interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tMX7gCeaFc

Re: what to do with this?

Hi, Is it really "All rights reserved.”? Even with the MIT license below there may be some question raised about this. Thanks, Justin

Re: what to do with this?

Hi, > Is it really "All rights reserved.”? And looking through the rest of your code I can see it common practice. AFAIK it's not needed and has no legal standing. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved

Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #152

See Changes: -- [...truncated 315.58 KB...] Cleaning... Configuring... Copy files Select C

Re: Meadow.OS .NET Standard 2.0 on STM32F7 (NUTTX + Mono Framework)

Nice! Azure Edge Computing :-) Op do 14 mei 2020 01:21 schreef Alan Carvalho de Assis : > Very interesting: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1tMX7gCeaFc >