Re: NuttX seminar online 1th April 2020 14:30 European time

Hi Ben, I think this is a good idea. I'm fine, thank you. BR, Alan On 3/31/20, Disruptive Solutions wrote: > In these Corona days I have the idea to make a online seminar “Getting > started with Nuttx”. I also made a VirtualBox image for the participants. I > am still learning Nuttx myself, b

Fail checks no new warnings?

Hi, list, This is something that I wanted to add to the incubator-nuttx-testing, but it appears that no issues are supported in that repository.  That is a problem; issues should be enabled for the testing repository as well. Anyway... I was looking at some successful logs from recent checks

Re: Fail checks no new warnings?

  I did this manually when I ran the build tests myself:  I just kept the last good test log and diff'ed the current test log with that known good log.  Any new warnings would show up in the diffs.  The tricky part is that there is a lot of other kruft that shows up in the diffs too like

RE: Fail checks no new warnings?

Hi Greg, I was able to do this once before: #if !defined(TODO) # if !defined(NO_PRINT_TODOS) # define DO_PRAGMA(x) _Pragma (#x) # define TODO(x) DO_PRAGMA(message ("TODO - " #x)) # else # define TODO(x) # endif #endif IIRC it allowed me to print compiler output that was not treated as war

Re: Fail checks no new warnings?

I was able to do this once before: #if !defined(TODO) # if !defined(NO_PRINT_TODOS) # define DO_PRAGMA(x) _Pragma (#x) # define TODO(x) DO_PRAGMA(message ("TODO - " #x)) # else # define TODO(x) # endif #endif IIRC it allowed me to print compiler output that was not treated as warnings t

Re: Fail checks no new warnings?

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:25 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > > > I was able to do this once before: > > > > #if !defined(TODO) > > # if !defined(NO_PRINT_TODOS) > > # define DO_PRAGMA(x) _Pragma (#x) > > # define TODO(x) DO_PRAGMA(message ("TODO - " #x)) > > # else > > # define TODO(x) > > # endi

Re: Fail checks no new warnings?

Hi Xiang, Yes, since there are few warnings it is better to fix them. BR, Alan On 4/1/20, Xiang Xiao wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:25 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: >> >> >> > I was able to do this once before: >> > >> > #if !defined(TODO) >> > # if !defined(NO_PRINT_TODOS) >> > # define DO_PR

Re: Fail checks no new warnings?

Almost warning come from #warning, we can: 1.Add -Wno-cpp to disable #warning for precheck/nightly build: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9793293/how-do-i-disable-warning-message-in-gcc 2.Fix the remaining real warnning 3.Enable -Werror for precheck/nightly build The suggestion from D

Re: SAMA5D27 SDMMC support branch

Takeyoshi, I did some work on the SDMCC driver today, it compiles now and I pushed the code to the branch. I will try it and let you know how it goes. I am still not sure everything is right, for instance why do I have to specify SDMMC0_SIZE? The sama5d2x_memorymap.c file seems to need it. But it

Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #83

See Changes: -- [...truncated 565.45 KB...] Cleaning... Configuring... Copy files Select CO