Re: [PATCH] doubt about fwrite

Hi Peng, >From http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cstdio/fwrite/ fwrite return zero to indicate the error, the detailed info could get from errno. So the right change is modified the error handling code in nsh_catfile, not the return type of fwrite. Thanks Xiang On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 9:48 AM we

Re: [PATCH] doubt about fwrite

Thanks for gregory and xiang. yes... the right way is modified the error handling code in nsh_catfile not fwrite. I will repaired it again. BR, wei peng Xiang Xiao 于2019年12月24日周二 上午9:58写道： > Hi Peng, > From http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cstdio/fwrite/ > fwrite return zero to indicate the e

Re: Single Committer

I definitely support this approach: keep the original workflow before the new workflow setup. We have enough time to achieve "THE APACHE WAY" step by step before NuttX graduate to the top level project. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:51 AM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > Recent events have made me reconsider

Re: Single Committer

bq. I would create a dev branch and expect all PRs to be against that dev branch. An alternative way could be make master/trunk branch a dev branch and allow all PRs to checked in, at the same time, maintain a stable branch which you can cut release (as release manager) and pick up PRs that you car

Re: Single Committer

On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 7:51 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > Recent events have made me reconsider some decisions I made. I threw > off the single committer mantle when I saw the abuse of privilege in the > repositories. If the PPMC agrees to it, I will take up that role again. > > But let's be frank

Re: Single Committer

+1 Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 24 dec. 2019 om 06:07 heeft Nathan Hartman het > volgende geschreven: > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 7:51 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: >> >> Recent events have made me reconsider some decisions I made. I threw >> off the single committer mantle when I saw the abu

Re: Single Committer

A platform like this could help? Samsung seems to use it? Does Apache has something like this “Helix Core” and “Swarm” ?? https://www.perforce.com/products/helix-swarm Benefit drom these ideas? And you could start with 1 commiter and scale up later. The way of working will be getting more clear

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx] huahang opened a new pull request #3: Implement SO_ERROR for getsockopt()

huahang opened a new pull request #3: Implement SO_ERROR for getsockopt() URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/3 This change implements SO_ERROR for getsockopt() Signed-off-by: liuhuahang This is an auto

Why the text displayed by SSD1306 / I2C is reversed along the vertical axis

Hi~ I am trying the graphics module of nuttx. I just used the nxtext sample program and found that the text displayed on oled is reversed. It seems that each character is flipped vertically. Does anyone know what is going on here? how should I solve this? Thank you! BOARD:STM32F407VE（compatible

Re: Single Committer

This makes sense giving the circumstances. It will get us going. We can still help reviewing PRs. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019, 08:03 Disruptive Solutions < disruptivesolution...@gmail.com> wrote: > A platform like this could help? Samsung seems to use it? Does Apache has > something like this “Helix Cor

Re: Single Committer

+1 the old way of working was ok but this will put pressure on Greg again. We should define the workflow as soon as possible and work as we are intended to. On Tue, Dec 24, 2019, 09:48 Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > This makes sense giving the circumstances. It wi

<    1   2