>From: Nathan Hartman
>Sent: 09 September 2022 12:50
>To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SAMA5D2 DMA
>
>> Rather than clutter sam_xdmac.h with loads of #if defined (SAMA5D2)
>> stuff would it be better to deal with this in the same way as the
>> memor
On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 7:44 AM TimH wrote:
> >From: TimH
> >Sent: 07 September 2022 12:14
> >
> >A quick dabble with DMA for the SAMA5D2 chip I'm using suggests the native
> >NuttX support for this is incorrect and probably applies to SAMA5D3 chips
> etc.
> >There are refences in sam_xdmac.c to
>From: TimH
>Sent: 07 September 2022 12:14
>
>A quick dabble with DMA for the SAMA5D2 chip I'm using suggests the native
>NuttX support for this is incorrect and probably applies to SAMA5D3 chips
etc.
>There are refences in sam_xdmac.c to PIDS that simply don't exist in the
>SAMA5D2.
>
On further
