> > But there would be many, many smaller issues of compatibility with
> > header files, data structures, etc. This effort would be complex,
> > invasive, and probably more work than anyone really would want to
> > commit to doing.
> > He said it would be like “a death from a thousand cuts.”
>
> I
On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 5:30 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
>
> You are right, currently Apex RTOS and RT-Thread (only their "Smart
> brand" that only works on CPU with MMU) are using musl lib.
>
> So it could be useful to have musl support for NuttX.
Why not make NuttX libc as good as possibl
On 7/14/22, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> On 12/Jul/2022 10:38, Xiang Xiao wrote:
>> musl is designed to work exclusively with Linux and then there is no OS
>> abstraction layer. So it's hard to adapt musl to other OS.
>
> Not really, adapting to another kernel is as simple as either providing
> the miss
On 12/Jul/2022 10:38, Xiang Xiao wrote:
> musl is designed to work exclusively with Linux and then there is no OS
> abstraction layer. So it's hard to adapt musl to other OS.
Not really, adapting to another kernel is as simple as either providing
the missing syscalls, adding stubs, or emulating th
On 11/Jul/2022 21:10, Gregory Nutt wrote:
<...>
> MUSL supports only Linux. Hopefully, the MUSL OS interface is
> well modularized to support use of a different OS.
Musl is well-structured, ports aren't difficult.
<...>
> But there would be many, many smaller issues of compatibility with
> heade
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:38 AM Xiang Xiao wrote:
> musl is designed to work exclusively with Linux and then there is no OS
> abstraction layer. So it's hard to adapt musl to other OS.
> Alan asks a good question: what benefit do you want to get from replacing
> NuttX' libc with musl?
Just my 2 c
People have talked about using other C libraries in the past, but no one
has been successful.
C libraries support an operating specific interface. For example, a Linux
LibC will need to use Linux system calls and Linux data structures to
interface with the kernel. A similar interface would be
musl is designed to work exclusively with Linux and then there is no OS
abstraction layer. So it's hard to adapt musl to other OS.
Alan asks a good question: what benefit do you want to get from replacing
NuttX' libc with musl?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 9:50 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Hi P
Hi Prelude,
I don't think someone already tried it before.
BTW, why do you want to do it?
BR,
Alan
On Monday, July 11, 2022, prelude wrote:
>
>
> I am currently working on a project that I want to transplant musl LIC to
> nuttx to replace the built-in libc, have any friends done similar work
