On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:12 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> I think we need to assure that these two "tiers" are compatible and use
> the same test infrastructure. The should have these things in common:
I'd like to move this discussion to a new thread, titled "Automated
Testing" without several leve
* The next tier could be an automated test suite that runs in a
simulator.
This would be accessible to the greatest numbers of developers and
contributors, because there's nothing to buy.
* The highest tier could be testing on a reference hardware board.
I think we need to assure th
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 12:03 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> Build testing is important but does not address functionality. Things
> can be completely broken and still build perfectly.
Correct.
> Currently our functional testing strategy is simply to ask people to
> check releases. But no problems ha
I have no preference. At some point, I think we also have to say that
9.0.x "is what it is". Or do you see us continuing to maintain the
release forever? In the dark, pre-Apache past, I had about a two week
period after the release after which it "is what it is". I distrubuted
patches up un
On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 7:11 PM Brennan Ashton
wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2020, 3:59 PM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > Hi, Brennan,
> > >>> I just created incubator-nuttx-apps PR 255 that should restore the
> > >>> correct behavior:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-apps/pull/255
> > >>
