I'm agreeing with you Greg, anything that comes into Apps or the OS
must use the socket API.
Then we are in agreement. I am a mother hen and will defend the OS
architecture to the teeth (hmm.. hens.. teeth... sorry about the mixed
metaphor).
I don't get involved in most code changes. I
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:56 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
> > Lets try to see how we can move this forward, I'm not fully sure I
> > fully understand the implications of what you were saying about the
> > packet protocol, but I think it is best that we focus the discussion
> > on that in the GitHub issu
On 8/26/2020 10:56 AM, Gregory Nutt wrote:
Lets bring this back to a constructive place.
An Chao I really appreciate the detailed information that you wrote,
while I don't think it will be appropriate to include directly
upstream it is still valuable to know how you are trying to use this
and
Lets bring this back to a constructive place.
An Chao I really appreciate the detailed information that you wrote,
while I don't think it will be appropriate to include directly
upstream it is still valuable to know how you are trying to use this
and it helps us make an informed decision movin
> 发件人: Gregory Nutt
> 发送时间: 2020年8月27日 0:30
> 收件人: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> 主题: Re: 答复: [External Mail]Re: defining a BLE GATT server
>
> > What you should do is to coordinate and and cooperate with the NuttX
> > team to get help from the community.
What you should do is to coordinate and and cooperate with the NuttX
team to get help from the community. If you chose to go your own way
and not discussion or cooperation with the team, then you are on your
own. That code will not come into the repository.
If you want to do things correc
As mentioned in the title, this is just an experimental project that needs to
discuss further the implementation of the bluetooth stack.
The implementation of bt stack in userspace does not conflict with the current
architecture, this is just a choice.
On the contrary, the complete BLE+MESH s
I will add my two cents as well. I have already responded in comments
on PR #1651, but I will copy my reponse here form continuity:
I am in 100% agreement with Brennan and Matias. I am very opposed to
this change because it violates all of the architectural principles that
have been establish
