Yes, I also noticed the "404" issue for the first URL. The correct URL is:
https://www.sparkfun.com/micromod
It's a good find nonetheless. Thank you Alan!
~ SS
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:44 AM Disruptive Solutions <
disruptivesolution...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The first link gives a 404. The conc
The first link gives a 404. The concept of modularity is nice, but it looks
like "just another board". Its more the choice off a mcu family and needed
criteria for your solution thats interesting. Like for e.g. the MCU finder
from STM32 and MAPS from Microchip.
Most of the solutions have a durable
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020, 2:35 PM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Sparkfun just created an interesting board ecosystem that could let
> > people to replace the MCU module and still having access to the base
> > boa
I think that is one of the good use cases of devicetree. You could indeed
easily change the device definition and have it generate the appropriate
bindings.
Best,
Matias
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020, at 18:34, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:20 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Sparkfun just created an interesting board ecosystem that could let
> people to replace the MCU module and still having access to the base
> board features:
>
> https://www.sparkfun.com/micromoddev
>
> https://www.s
