Good question. From what I read, inline functions ARE copyright-able,
but of course, that is also controversial:
https://lwn.net/Articles/53964/
Stallman's FSF statement implies that it depends on the /amount /of GPL
code in the inline functions:
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/03/20/15
The PR contains the implementation of inline functions. Are those handled
in the same way as symbols definitions?
Best regards,
Petro
ср, 13 квіт. 2022 р. о 16:10 Alan Carvalho de Assis
пише:
> Simple header files, for example only symbols definitions are not
> considered derivative work, more
Simple header files, for example only symbols definitions are not
considered derivative work, more info:
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/03/20/1529238/rms-on-header-files-and-derivative-works
On 4/13/22, Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
>> We are having a PRhttps://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pul
We are having a PRhttps://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5755 that
is intended to update "include/nuttx/wireless/ieee80211/ieee80211.h" header
in NuttX code tree.
the changes are the sync with
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/ieee80211.h
verison that is avail
